Questioning the HIV Cure

Sensitive tests reveal the Berlin patient believed to be cured of HIV still carries HIV RNA and antibodies.

By | June 12, 2012

Wellcome Images" > HIV viruses break away from a lymphocyte. THE CELL, Wellcome Images

HIV viruses break away from a lymphocyte.THE CELL, WELLCOME IMAGES

Five years ago, Timothy Brown received transplants of bone marrow in Berlin to treat his leukemia. Because he also happened to be HIV-positive, he doctor chose a donor that carried a mutation in the CCR5 gene, which encodes a co-receptor that HIV uses to infect cells. Following his surgeries, Brown was able to stop conventional antiretroviral treatment and was deemed cured in 2009 when the virus failed to return. But research presented at the International Workshop on HIV & Hepatitis Virus last week (June 8) found HIV signals still lingering in Brown’s blood plasma, sparking well-known HIV researcher Alain Lafeuillade to suggest he has been re-infected, or was never cured.

Several labs looked at Brown’s blood, and some, but not all, found evidence of circulating viral RNA using sensitive PCR tests. Two strains of the virus were sequenced, which did not match each other or the original virus, suggesting Brown may have been re-infected. But no labs isolated virus that could copy itself, suggesting to collaborator Tae-Wook Chun that Brown may just have harmless pieces of the virus left over from the initial infection. But even these infection remnants, while harmless to Brown, may be infectious to other people, Lafeuillade said.

But those involved in the study have condemned Lafeuillade’s remarks, with session chair and collaborator Douglas Richman telling ScienceInsider that Lafeuillade "completely misinterpreted" the presentation. "We weren't trying to say HIV was still there or he [Brown] hadn't been cured,” added Steven Yukl, who gave the talk. “The point of the presentation was to raise the question of how do we define a cure and, at this level of detection, how do we know the signal is real?"

Richman is among the collaborators that found nothing, and thinks the result may be due to contamination issues. He staunchly defends the position that Brown is cured. "[Brown's] been off ARVs for 5 years,” he told ScienceInsider. “That trumps all these assays."

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Jonathan Winger

Jonathan Winger

Posts: 1

June 13, 2012

The picture caption is erroneous: HIV is a virus, not a cell.

Avatar of: TheSciAdmin


Posts: 56

June 13, 2012

Good point! Changed now.
Thanks - Hayley Dunning

June 14, 2012

The link to the image in The Cell has a " at that end which is taking one to an error page. Simply removing the " should correct this. 

Avatar of: TheSciAdmin


Posts: 56

June 14, 2012

Thanks for pointing out the broken link, David. It has been fixed.

Thanks for reading,
Jef Akst, editor, The Scientist

Popular Now

  1. Genetic Test Solves Royal Mystery
    Notebook Genetic Test Solves Royal Mystery

    Genetic analyses lay to rest conspiracy theories about death of Belgian King Albert I, who lost his life in a rock climbing accident more than 80 years ago.

  2. Investigation Finds Pathologist Guilty of Systemic Misconduct
  3. Bacteria and Humans Have Been Swapping DNA for Millennia
  4. Opinion: Stop Submitting Papers