Advertisement

ArXiv Attracts Biologists

Life scientists are increasingly posting manuscripts to the preprint server, joining the ranks of thousands of physicists.

By | August 1, 2012

image: ArXiv Attracts Biologists Wikimedia Commons, Loty

Population geneticists seem to be catching on to the benefits of posting their manuscripts on arXiv.org, a 20-year-old preprint server that has previously been the domain of physicists, mathematicians, and computer scientists. Researchers in those fields have been self-archiving preprints of their papers in arXiv since 1991, when Cornell University theoretical physicist Paul Ginspar launched the site. But in the past month, leading population geneticists have posted their papers to arXiv. "It's wonderful if biologists are belatedly joining the late 20th century," Ginspar told Nature. "Welcome to the party; better late than never."

ArXiv has maintained a section for quantitative biologists since 2003, but the papers posted there are dwarfed by the huge number of manuscripts submitted by physical scientists.

But in July, researchers from Harvard and Stanford Universities posted a high-profile paper on the genomic variation between 22 populations of African people. And earlier this year, Princeton University grad student Marshall Louis Reaves and colleagues posted a paper refuting the claim that bacteria found in a California could subsist on arsenic in the absence of phosphorus in arXiv before publishing it in Science.

Statistical geneticist Graham Coop of the University of California, Davis, also posted a paper comparing genetic attributes between European populations in arXiv last month. "Biology will soon have to embrace this trend fully," he told Nature. "The speed of discussion, comment, and pre-publication review allowed is needed in biology more than most fields."

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Joe Vanegas

Joe Vanegas

Posts: 3

August 7, 2012

The adoption data seem to support the model that ArXiv has failed to serve the biology community satisfactorily, and that 21st century biologists are putting their data elsewhere.

Advertisement

Popular Now

  1. The Zombie Literature
    Features The Zombie Literature

    Retractions are on the rise. But reams of flawed research papers persist in the scientific literature. Is it time to change the way papers are published?

  2. A Scrambled Mess
    Features A Scrambled Mess

    Why do so many human eggs have the wrong number of chromosomes?

  3. The Two Faces of Fish Oil
    Notebook The Two Faces of Fish Oil

    The discovery of a tumor-protecting role for a fatty acid found in fish oil has sparked debate about the product’s safety.

  4. Bacterium Blocks Zika’s Spread
Advertisement
Advertisement
RayBioTech