HIV Drugs Go Generic

Patent expirations of one HIV drugs will make the disease cheaper—but also more cumbersome—to treat.

By | August 16, 2012

.v1ctor." > Flickr Creative Commons, .v1ctor.

This year, the United States is expected to spend nearly $15 billion on healthcare for HIV patients, which still doesn’t cover all of the patients who need treatment. But those costs are expected to decrease in the next few years as the patents for brand-name antiretrovirals expire.

“AIDS, as we currently know it, may become much more affordable,” John Bartlett, an infectious-disease researcher at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Nature.

The three-in-one antiretroviral Atripla is considered the go-to first line therapy for HIV and is made up of two drugs made by Gilead Sciences and one by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). While only one component from this cocktail, BMS’s efavirenz, will go off patent next year, a second component already has a readily available generic substitute. The cost saving from these two drugs is estimated to save $920 million in the first year.

Although it will be more cumbersome for patients to take three pills per day instead of one, and as a result, they might be more likely to forget or skip doses, most advocates agree that that giving more people access to the medication is worth the trade-off.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Angelise Evony

Angelise Evony

Posts: 1457

August 16, 2012

This isn't the big news. The big news is that so much funding is spent to combat a disease that affects a very small niche portion of the population. I guess it's true what they say though, the squeaky wheel gets the most grease. :(

Popular Now

  1. UC Berkeley Receives CRISPR Patent in Europe
    Daily News UC Berkeley Receives CRISPR Patent in Europe

    The European Patent Office will grant patent rights over the use of CRISPR in all cell types to a University of California team, contrasting with a recent decision in the U.S.

  2. What Budget Cuts Might Mean for US Science
    News Analysis What Budget Cuts Might Mean for US Science

    A look at the historical effects of downsized research funding suggests that the Trump administration’s proposed budget could hit early-career scientists the hardest.  

  3. Opinion: On “The Impact Factor Fallacy”
  4. Unstructured Proteins Help Tardigrades Survive Desiccation
Business Birmingham