Advertisement
Gene Tools
Gene Tools

Boston to Test Bioterror Sensors

Federal officials will release harmless bacteria into subway tunnels beneath the Northeastern city to test new sensors designed to detect biological agents.

By | August 29, 2012

image: Boston to Test Bioterror Sensors Wikimedia, Fabyv07

The Boston subway system will soon host simulated biological weapon attacks as the Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) conducts tests of sensors designed to detect the presence of biological agents in metropolitan areas.

After temporarily shutting down the transportation system, S&T will release small quantities of harmless and inactive bacteria into subway tunnels under Beantown and monitor the spread of the dead microbes using newly developed sensors. The bacterium, Bacillus subtilis, is considered nontoxic even when alive and active.

S&T will be conducting the tests—which are part of its Detect-to-Protect (D2P) project—for the next 6 months, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Anne Hultgren, director of the D2P project, said that the tests will help determine if the new sensors, designed by a suite of contractors, are up to snuff. "While there is no known threat of a biological attack on subway systems in the United States, the S&T testing will help determine whether the new sensors can quickly detect biological agents in order to trigger a public safety response as quickly as possible," she said in a statement.

The new tests come at a precarious time for US anti-bioterrorism efforts. Last week, the Los Angeles Times reported that BioWatch, the federal government's key biological attack detection system, is prone to false alarms—many of which have occurred since its inception in 2003.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: EllenHunt

EllenHunt

Posts: 74

August 29, 2012

..

Avatar of: EllenHunt

EllenHunt

Posts: 74

August 29, 2012

..

Avatar of: Fabio Vieira

Fabio Vieira

Posts: 1457

August 29, 2012

...

Avatar of: Amanda Lightfoot

Amanda Lightfoot

Posts: 1457

August 30, 2012

It's rather interesting, actually. There's always risk, but still. This doesn't seem too different from treated tap water. I'm not going to freak out about this stuff too much; the crap we carelessly put in the air via combustion engines is far more deadly and worrisome.

Avatar of: pathman25

pathman25

Posts: 3

August 30, 2012

This has been done before with "harmless" bacteria and people got sick. See here:
http://rense.com/general15/ofM...

Avatar of: pathman25

pathman25

Posts: 3

August 30, 2012

I realize the comments are moderated here but it seems nothing is getting through. What's up with that?

Avatar of: pathman25

pathman25

Posts: 3

August 30, 2012

This was done before and it made people sick. See here:
http://rense.com/general15/ofM...

Avatar of: clare francis

clare francis

Posts: 1

September 2, 2012

Dear Bob,
Why don't the universities in Boston, e.g. Harvard,
pay attention to what is under their noses?
http://www.science-fraud.org/?...
http://www.science-fraud.org/?...
http://www.science-fraud.org/?...

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
CEM
CEM
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews
Life Technologies