Advertisement
Bethyl Laboratories
Bethyl Laboratories

Experimental Lakes Face Closure

A unique resource for studying environmental impacts on freshwater systems is threatened by federal funding cuts.

By | August 22, 2012

image: Experimental Lakes Face Closure EXPERIMENTAL LAKES AREA

Canada has the most lakes in the world, and giving a few over to scientific research for the past 44 years has proven invaluable for environmental impact studies. But in May the Canadian government announced it was cutting funding for the historic Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) in Ontario, leaving the facility scrambling to find a new source funding or face closure in April 2013.

The 58 lakes that make up the experimental area have been subjected to contamination by a whole range of pollutants and disturbances, in order to assess their impacts on the freshwater ecosystems. Studies with fertilizers in the 1960s and 70s were instrumental in proving phosphorus's role in eutrophication—the starving of a lake of oxygen by massive blooms of blue-green algae—that ultimately led to the ban of phosphates from laundry and dishwasher detergents in Canada and the United States.

“It’s easy for regulatory agencies to dismiss research done in a lab, but it’s less easy to dismiss work done in whole lakes,” Chris Metcalfe, an environmental toxicologist from Trent University who works with the ELA, told Nature. “People sit up and take notice.” The slash of federal funding came as a surprise to most of the researchers and staff at the facility, especially since several large, long-term projects have recently begun, such as studying the impacts of silver nanoparticles on lake ecosystems and the ecological impact of accidental release of transgenic fish from fish farms.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans, responsible for the ELA, says the cut is the result of necessary funding restraints as its base budget will drop by 5.8 percent by 2015. ELA supporters say the facility's unique scientific value and relatively small running costs should be enough reason to save it from the axe, and decry the cut as reflecting "broader hostility towards environmental science within the federal government."

While there is some hope that funding will be picked up by universities, many are not in strong financial positions either, especially when any eventual clean-up of the land and water comprising the ELA would be the responsibility of any new managing body.

 

Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Gary  A

Gary A

Posts: 5

August 26, 2012

If figures that any effort to monitor our ecological system takes second place.
Most either don't care or are just plain ignorant of how important it is to
keep tabs on the effect we are having on nature. Yet we see terrible things
like bee colony collapse or loss of bats (one of the best insect controllers),
non indigenous insect invasions and the list goes on.
It remains that man is more capable of doing than understanding.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Advertisement
Life Technologies