Advertisement
AAAS
AAAS

Anti-GM Crop Study Gets Audited

European agencies will evaluate a recent study that links genetically modified corn to early death.

By | September 25, 2012

image: Anti-GM Crop Study Gets Audited Wikimedia Commons, Zeamays

French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault and The European Commission announced last week (September 20) that multiple oversight agencies, including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), will independently evaluate a new study that purports genetically modified (GM) maize—approved for commercial use in Europe and the United States—is toxic.

The study, published last week (September 19) in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, claims that rats fed GM maize for 2 years suffered from tumors, organ damage, and early death. But, since the article’s highly unusual unveiling—in which media were forced to sign non-disclosure agreements that barred them from seeking outside comments from scientific experts in advance of the study’s release—researchers have thoroughly lambasted the experiment’s design, data, and analysis.

The study, led by Gilles-Eric Séralini of the University of Caen in France, reports that rats fed GM maize developed large mammary tumors as well as liver and kidney damage, and found that 50 percent of males and 70 percent of females died early, compared to 20 percent of males and 30 percent of females in a control group. But experts point out flaws, including that the strain of rat used in the study is prone to tumors. Also, 25 percent of the control rats, which were not fed GM maize, died of tumors. And the rats given the highest levels of GM maize in their feed survived longer than rats fed lower levels of GM maize.

Despite scientific criticism, French media followed the study’s release with headlines, including “Yes, GMOs are Poison!,” prompting the EFSA to release a short statement saying that they would evaluate the study in the context of ongoing GM crop safety monitoring. The High Council for Biotechnology (HCB) and the Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety will also look into the study.

In 2007, the EFSA performed a similar evaluation of another of Séralini’s papers, which challenged the approval of a different GM maize variety, only to find that the study’s statistics were flawed and did “not present a sound scientific justification” to doubt the GM crop’s safety.

Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: EllenHunt

EllenHunt

Posts: 74

September 25, 2012

Much as I think Monsanto has pursued some heinous business practices, (e.g. suing farmers in neighboring fields for patent infringement, harassing harvesters to prevent them from harvesting non-GMO beans) it does nobody any good to lie about these things. It is obvious on its face this study cannot be meaningful because people have been consuming this stuff for a long time. This study will set back real science and taints anybody that investigates real problems.

Avatar of: spritrig

spritrig

Posts: 1

September 25, 2012

So are you saying it is ethical to experiment on people without informed consent? No labeling means people are uninformed. No testing requirement means people are experimented on.

September 25, 2012

smaller doses take more time, and what do we really know about the burgeoning rise of asthma, diabetes, cancer, autism, and many other attacks on our health? I just think caution is the better route until Monsanto et al. allows outside independent and long-term testing on their "patented" products that don't require testing because they are "substantially the same"!

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Life Technologies