Evolving Dependence

Scientists unravel the confusing molecular biology behind a fruit fly’s reliance on a single type of cactus.

By | September 27, 2012

image: Evolving Dependence ARNAUD MARTIN

Mutations to a cholesterol-metabolism gene are responsible for restricting one species of fruit fly to life on a particularly rare cactus, according to a report in Science, out today (September 27). But despite causing this loss in diet diversity, the mutations were under positive selection and appear to provide flies with a fitness advantage.

“One generally thinks of things that drive evolution as things that would expand the niche, whereas this is actually restricting it,” said Michael O’Connor, a fruit fly biologist at the University of Minnesota, who was not involved in the study. “That seems very curious.”

Indeed, the new study on the fruit fly species Drosophila pachea stands in stark contrast to the generally held belief that loss of a metabolic activity happens by chance rather than being selected for, explained Virginie Orgogozo, an evolutionary biologist at the Institut Jacques Monod in Paris, France. Orgogozo and her team were interested in why D. pachea has become utterly dependent on the senita cactus, which is found only in the Sonoran desert of Northwestern Mexico and the Southwestern United States. They knew that D. pachea had lost the ability to convert cholesterol into 7-dehydrocholesterol (7DHC)—the first step in a pathway that produces an essential hormone for flies to metamorphose from larvae to adults. They also knew that the senita cactus, which doesn’t produce cholesterol, is the only plant in the desert to produce alternative sterols that D. pachea can use. But what drove D. pachea to this restricted metabolism and diet, however, was unclear.

A few years ago, researchers discovered the enzyme responsible for converting cholesterol to 7DHC. It was named Neverland because flies that lacked the protein never transitioned from larvae to adults. Orgogozo knew immediately that Neverland would be a great starting point to look for differences in D. pachea. “I was really expecting a loss of function or that there would be no gene,” she said. But Neverland was present in D. pachea and displayed a pattern and level of expression similar to that in other fruit flies. “This was the first surprise,” said Orgogozo.

DNA sequencing did reveal several amino acid differences in the D. pachea Neverland protein, however. And, subsequent functional assays revealed that four of these differences were responsible for the loss of its cholesterol-converting ability. D. pachea’s version of Neverland was instead capable of making 7DHC from lathosterol—a rare sterol made in senita cacti.

Then came another surprise: the Neverland enzymes from other species were capable of utilizing lathosterol too. Not only that, the other species’ enzymes were better at it. The four amino acid mutations in D. pachea had thus also impaired an ancestral lathosterol-converting capability. “This was very strange,” said Orgogozo.

Complicating matters further, a sequence analysis indicated the mutations in D. pachea’s Neverland exhibited low sequence diversity between individuals, suggesting that the gene had undergone positive selection.  “When you have a new mutation arising in a population, it will spread rapidly if it has any advantage, so there is no time to accumulate new mutations,” Orgogozo explained.

Studies in live flies confirmed this positive-selection prediction. Replacing the Neverland protein of D. melanogaster with that from D. pachea conferred a significant fitness advantage. More of the recipient D. melanogaster larvae made it to adulthood—when fed on a lathosterol-containing diet—than did wildtype D. melanogaster fed their normal cholesterol-containing diet.

“We always think an enzyme has to be the best possible, but maybe for the organism it is better to have an enzyme which is not so efficient,” Orgogozo said, suggesting that perhaps a slower enzyme might prevent the hormone being created at the wrong time or place.

Whatever the reason for the fitness advantage, the mutations to D. pachea’s Neverland might be a double-edged sword, said Stephen Schaeffer, a molecular population geneticist at the Pennsylvania State University, who did not participate in the research. “It’s an advantage right now because it doesn’t have competition from other fly species”—not only does the senita cactus not produce cholesterol, it also has toxins to which only D. pachea is resistant—“but it’s not unheard of for habitats to be destroyed. If this cactus disappeared, this fly would be in bad shape,” Schaeffer said.

 

M. Lang et al., “Mutations in the Neverland gene turned Drosophila pachea into an obligate specialist species,” Science, doi: 10.1126/science.1224829, 2012.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Ed M.

Ed M.

Posts: 44

October 8, 2012

Niche-adaptation, or narrow-adaptation, is a risky business.

It eventually fails the species which employs (or is employed by) it, because environments do nothing but change as Heraclitus noted several millennia ago: "Panta rhea. (All is flux)".

Creatures that overspecialize tend to get fluxed.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
Mettler Toledo
Mettler Toledo

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
BioTek
BioTek
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist