Advertisement
BD Biosciences
BD Biosciences

Will NIH Return to Three-Strikes?

The National Institutes of Health is reconsidering a rule that limited the numbers of submissions for a given grant applicants to two, due to popular demand for the three-strike policy.

By | October 17, 2012

William H. Natcher Builder, on the NIH campus in Bethesda, MDWikimedia Commons, Sage RossIn 2009 the National Institutes of Health (NIH), implemented a new rule, reducing the number of times applicants could apply for a grant with the same proposal from three to two. The agency had found that the additional submissions were creating a bottleneck that delayed the review of first-time submissions. According to a Nature blog, the NIH will now consider repealing that rule, and returning to the former three-strikes policy.

After the two strikes rule was implemented researchers “complained of it nearly incessantly to the NIH Office of Extramural Research,” Nature reported. In 2011, cancer biologist Robert Benezra from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center sent a petition with more than 2,300 signatures to the NIH, asking the agency to return to three strikes.  The reason, the researchers argued, is that in a tight funding environment, the decision of one grant reviewer can banish a proposal from success. By resubmitting, scientists get a second shot, often with a whole new review committee.

“If a reviewer doesn’t like how you use semicolons, or is having a bad hair day before the coffee kicks in , or was once threatened by one of your papers, you can fall from [the top] 6 percent to 12 percent in a flash , without any reflection on the actual merits of the application,” John Moore from Weill Cornell Medical College told Nature

(Hat tip to GenomeWeb.)

 

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: cloa513

cloa513

Posts: 1

October 31, 2012

They should saying these reviewer should be fired or removed if they act in unprofessional manner- They must assess on the merits only. Make a complaint see if the NHI is a professional organisation. 

Avatar of: ELM

ELM

Posts: 2

November 14, 2012

Funding is tight. I agree we need the three strikes rule back. Two strikes is killing young investigators, not helping them. You want to reduce bottle neck? Get more reviewers and revamp the study sections.

Advertisement
EMD Millipore
EMD Millipore

Popular Now

  1. The Mycobiome
    Features The Mycobiome

    The largely overlooked resident fungal community plays a critical role in human health and disease.

  2. Antibody Alternatives
    Features Antibody Alternatives

    Nucleic acid aptamers and protein scaffolds could change the way researchers study biological processes and treat disease.

  3. Circadian Clock and Aging
    Daily News Circadian Clock and Aging

    Whether a critical circadian clock gene is deleted before or after birth impacts the observed aging-related effects in mice.

  4. Holding Their Ground
    Features Holding Their Ground

    To protect the global food supply, scientists want to understand—and enhance—plants’ natural resistance to pathogens.

Advertisement
Bertin Technologies
Bertin Technologies
Advertisement
Life Technologies