Will NIH Return to Three-Strikes?

The National Institutes of Health is reconsidering a rule that limited the numbers of submissions for a given grant applicants to two, due to popular demand for the three-strike policy.

By | October 17, 2012

William H. Natcher Builder, on the NIH campus in Bethesda, MDWikimedia Commons, Sage RossIn 2009 the National Institutes of Health (NIH), implemented a new rule, reducing the number of times applicants could apply for a grant with the same proposal from three to two. The agency had found that the additional submissions were creating a bottleneck that delayed the review of first-time submissions. According to a Nature blog, the NIH will now consider repealing that rule, and returning to the former three-strikes policy.

After the two strikes rule was implemented researchers “complained of it nearly incessantly to the NIH Office of Extramural Research,” Nature reported. In 2011, cancer biologist Robert Benezra from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center sent a petition with more than 2,300 signatures to the NIH, asking the agency to return to three strikes.  The reason, the researchers argued, is that in a tight funding environment, the decision of one grant reviewer can banish a proposal from success. By resubmitting, scientists get a second shot, often with a whole new review committee.

“If a reviewer doesn’t like how you use semicolons, or is having a bad hair day before the coffee kicks in , or was once threatened by one of your papers, you can fall from [the top] 6 percent to 12 percent in a flash , without any reflection on the actual merits of the application,” John Moore from Weill Cornell Medical College told Nature

(Hat tip to GenomeWeb.)

 

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: cloa513

cloa513

Posts: 1

October 31, 2012

They should saying these reviewer should be fired or removed if they act in unprofessional manner- They must assess on the merits only. Make a complaint see if the NHI is a professional organisation. 

Avatar of: ELM

ELM

Posts: 2

November 14, 2012

Funding is tight. I agree we need the three strikes rule back. Two strikes is killing young investigators, not helping them. You want to reduce bottle neck? Get more reviewers and revamp the study sections.

Popular Now

  1. A Potential Remedy for the Aging Brain
    The Scientist A Potential Remedy for the Aging Brain

    In mice, injected fragments of a naturally occurring protein boost memory in young and old animals and improve cognition and mobility in a model of neurodegenerative disease. 

  2. The Sleeping Brain Can Learn
    Daily News The Sleeping Brain Can Learn

    Humans can remember new sensory information presented during REM sleep, but this ability is suppressed during deep, slow-wave slumber.

  3. USDA Emails: Don’t Use “Climate Change”
  4. Nature Index Identifies Top Contributors to Innovation
AAAS