Charles Darwin for Congress

Nominated as a write-in candidate as a protest against the anti-science incumbent, famed naturalist Charles Darwin won 4,000 congressional votes in a Georgia county.

By | November 13, 2012

Wikimedia, TrachemysHe died more than a century ago but Charles Darwin still managed to garner the support of more than 4,000 voters in the congressional race in Athens-Clarke county, Georgia, last week after a local scientist organized a Facebook campaign in protest against the incumbent Republican representative.

James Leebens-Mack, a plant biologist at the University of Georgia in Athens was horrified when he heard that Congressman Paul Broun (R), himself a medical doctor, had delivered a speech in a local church denouncing evolutionary theory, embryology, and the big bang theory as “lies straight from the pit of hell”—especially since Broun sits on the US House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology, and chairs its Subcommittee on Innovations and Insight.

To register his disgust, Leebens-Mack set up a Facebook page called “Darwin for Congress,” inviting people to vote for the great British naturalist as a write-in candidate against Broun, who ran unopposed for re-election.

Broun comfortably defeated his long-deceased rival, receiving 16,980 votes in Athens-Clarke county. But Darwin tallied 4,000 votes, which “should make it clear to future opponents that there are a lot of people in the district who are not happy with anti-science statements,” Leebens-Mack told ScienceInsider.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 212

November 14, 2012

Leebens-Mack should have taken a much higher road and declared himself as a write-in candidate.  The dead cannot talk, and he would have gotten a whole lot more than 4,000 votes.

Popular Now

  1. Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal
    News & Opinion Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal

    My “colleagues” and I at the fictitious Arthur Vandelay Urological Research Institute were surprised to find our bogus “uromycitisis” case report swiftly accepted, with only minor revisions requested.

  2. Consilience, Episode 3: Cancer, Obscured
  3. March for Science: Dispatches from Washington, DC
  4. Record-Setting Corn Grows 45 Feet Tall
AAAS