Failing Alzheimer’s Test?

Two new studies claim that a shoddy test may have caused Alzheimer’s drugs to fail in clinical trials.

By | December 19, 2012

Flickr, kevin dooleyAfter several drugs promising to slow or even reverse the cognitive decline of Alzheimer’s disease flopped in clinical trials the past few years, two new studies suggest that one of the standard tests to measure cognitive performance may have been the common stumbling block. The new studies, both published in Alzheimer's & Dementia yesterday (Decebmer 18), provide evidence that the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive Behavior section (ADAS-Cog) may not be sensitive enough to detect minor improvements, but other researchers are skeptical that the ADAS-Cog was the downfall of previous trials.

 “The negative results are due to the small effect size of the drug being tested and not the measurement instrument,” Stephen Salloway, director of neurology and the Memory and Aging Program at Butler Hospital in Providence, Rhode Island, told Nature. “I wish I could blame it on the test.”

The ADAS-Cog test—which scores patients in 11 areas, such as memory and language—was developed in 1984, when scientists and clinicians’ understanding of Alzheimer’s was more limited. In the new studies, researchers led by Jeremy Hobart, a neurologist at the Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry in the United Kingdom, found that the test wasn’t able to distinguish fine changes in patients in the early stages of disease. Moreover, Hobart and colleagues used a mathematical model to show that the test tended to bunch patients into groups of test scores, rather than along a continuous spectrum.

While researchers are reluctant to say that the test definitively contributed to some drugs failing in clinical trials, many acknowledge that new tests are needed. “These papers are very timely because we need new tests . . . that are more sensitive,” Salloway told Nature.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Popular Now

  1. Running on Empty
    Features Running on Empty

    Regularly taking breaks from eating—for hours or days—can trigger changes both expected, such as in metabolic dynamics and inflammation, and surprising, as in immune system function and cancer progression.

  2. Athletes’ Microbiomes Differ from Nonathletes
  3. Mutation Linked to Longer Life Span in Men
  4. Immune Cells Deliver Cancer Drugs to the Brain
AAAS