Friend of Science to Lead House Committee

A conservative republican, and supporter of research, will be the chair of the House appropriations committee that controls the budgets for the National Institutes of Health.

By | January 9, 2013

JACK KINGSTONWIKIMEDIA, US CONGRESSRepresentative Jack Kingston, a republican from Georgia, is slated to be the new leader of the House committee that oversees budget decisions for major US science funding agencies. Dubbed the most conservative member of the House by National Journal, he is nonetheless seen as by many in the scientific community as a strong proponent of research.

“We are looking forward to working with him,” Mary Woolley, president of the advocacy group Research!America, told ScienceInsider. "He has made clear his support for breast cancer funding and for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He's the kind of person who gets the job done."

Although Kingston is known for being skeptical about the human contribution to climate change and Darwin’s theory of evolution, he has a track record of obtaining earmarks for his home state in support of research jobs. “He really wants to identify priorities and let the subcommittee members work their will,” Kingston’s spokesperson Chris Crawford told ScienceInsider. “There will be a lot of hearings with a lot of questions.”


Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Mike K.

Mike K.

Posts: 1

January 9, 2013

Does he support science or "earmarks for his home state"?

Avatar of: Mary Finelli

Mary Finelli

Posts: 14

January 9, 2013

"Although Kingston is known for being skeptical about the human contribution to climate change and Darwin’s theory of evolution..."

He sounds like a science skeptic.

Avatar of: FJScientist


Posts: 25

January 9, 2013

Agreed with both Mike and Mary. I am particularly skeptical of someone who uses the earmark process to hand-pick items that they individually think is valuable. I'd much rather see all science funding subjected to peer-review.

Avatar of: Socks


Posts: 1

January 12, 2013

I don't understand how someone who is skeptical to the overarching theme of biology can be considered a friend of science.

Avatar of: kienhoa68


Posts: 33

January 15, 2013

"Although Kingston is known for being skeptical about the human contribution to climate change and Darwin’s theory of evolution,"

At least the we have the possibility of great comedy.


Popular Now

  1. Sex Differences in the Brain
    Features Sex Differences in the Brain

    How male and female brains diverge is a hotly debated topic, but the study of model organisms points to differences that cannot be ignored.

  2. DNA Repair Pioneers Win Nobel
    Daily News DNA Repair Pioneers Win Nobel

    Tomas Lindahl, Paul Modrich, and Aziz Sancar have won this year’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their work elucidating mechanisms of DNA repair.

  3. Antioxidants Facilitate Melanoma Metastasis
    Daily News Antioxidants Facilitate Melanoma Metastasis

    Two compounds boost the ability of melanoma cells to invade other tissues in mice, providing additional evidence that antioxidants can be beneficial to malignant cells as well as healthy ones.

  4. LabQuiz: Name That Neuron!
Life Technologies