Review Retracted for Plagiarism

The authors of a review article on genome-wide association studies have retracted the paper due to “substantial textual overlap” with other sources.

By | January 29, 2013

FLICKR, FEATHEREDTARA review article charting the progress of genome-wide association studies in domestic animals has been retracted because its authors plagiarized other sources, reported Retraction Watch. The article, written by Hui Li and colleagues at the China’s Ministry of Agriculture and the Northeast Agricultural University and published in the Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, was found to contain “substantial textual overlap with previously published studies,” including a 2010 article in PLOS Genetics.

Writing at Retraction Watch, Adam Marcus pointed out that, “[f]inding passages of ‘textual overlap’ isn’t difficult manually—and would have been even easier with detection software, which makes us wonder whether any such screening occurred.” He also said that in several cases, the authors did reference the previously published article, but not until at least one sentence after the plagiarized text. “[W]hile not making what the researchers did right,” Marcus wrote, “[this] indicates that they may not have understood it to be plagiarism since, at least in the instances we observed, they did cite their sources.”

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Simkim

Simkim

Posts: 1

February 11, 2013

It’s true that it is very easy to detect the plagiarized write-up with the help of a plagiarism checker tool, so becomes important for the people to understand that they must not try to spoil their image by copying the lines written by someone else.

Advertisement

Popular Now

  1. How Fats Influence the Microbiome
  2. Censored Professor Quits
    The Nutshell Censored Professor Quits

    Alice Dreger is resigning from the faculty of Northwestern University, claiming that the administration censored her work in a faculty journal.

  3. Opinion: Engineering the Epigenome
  4. Psychology’s Failure to Replicate
Advertisement
BioTek
BioTek
Advertisement
Life Technologies