Advertisement

Japan’s Nuclear Reboot Stalled

Regulators are warning that the Asian country’s nuclear power infrastructure may still be vulnerable to earthquakes.

By | February 7, 2013

Japan's Oi Nuclear Plant, which houses the country's only still-running reactors, sits atop an inactive fault.WIKIMEDIA, NATIONAL AND IMAGE INFORMATION (COLOR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS), MINISTRY OF LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORT AND TOURISMAfter a devastating earthquake and tsunami hit Japan in March 2011, damaging and releasing radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi power plant, about 50 of the country’s nuclear reactors have been waiting for the green light to power back up. Though plans to reboot Japan’s slumbering nuclear reactors have been progressing since the disaster, a panel of geophysicists working for the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) is now warning that some of the plants that house them are still at risk of damage by earthquakes.

Initial reports issued by the NRA panel last month indicate that at least some of the reactors sit above active seismic faults that put the facilities in danger should earthquakes strike again. For example, the team of geophysicists has suggested that an active fault, defined as a region of the earth’s crust that has shifted causing an earthquake in the past 120,000 years, may lie below Japan’s Tsuruga nuclear plant, which was set to power back up soon. The NRA panel is investigating the seismic situation at Tsuruga, as well as potentially active faults near four other plants set to come back online soon.

But some in Japan, including seismologists and a nuclear industry eager to restore the country’s nuclear energy capacity, are questioning the NRA panel’s preliminary findings. Koji Okumura, a paleoseismologist at Hiroshima University who advised the Japanese government on rebooting the country’s nuclear infrastructure as part of the Nuclear Safety Commission until that body was replaced by the NRA in September 2012, told Nature that the NRA panel was being too conservative in their risk assessments. “They are being overly cautious just to avoid criticism,” Okumura said. “They think they’re like Superman, coming in to save us from the bad guys.”

The NRA will evaluate the panel’s report, and if it endorses findings that indicate an active fault line exists underneath a plant, the reactors housed there will not be allowed to operate.

Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
UVP
UVP
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist