Advertisement

Sticky Lithography

Scotch tape and a scalpel provide a MacGyver-esque approach to microfabrication.

By | March 1, 2013

Researchers may be able to ditch the expensive photolithography equipment used for making microfluidic flow cells and cell-patterning devices designed to study cellular spatial organization. Scotch tape and a scalpel are all that’s needed, says Raquel Perez-Castillejos, a biomedical engineer at the New Jersey Institute of Technology in Newark.

Typically, researchers use photolithographic technology to fabricate the tiny chambers and channels used in microfluidic devices, or wells for depositing cells onto specific parts of culture dishes and slides. However, the equipment can be expensive, and generally needs to be housed in dust-free facilities, which are not readily available to all researchers.

Perez-Castillejos realized that such a sophisticated and precise apparatus was not essential for tackling many research questions. “Sometimes we are trying to provide very high precision to problems that don’t require it, and we make it complicated for no reason,” she said.

Instead, her group made molds by sticking Scotch tape to glass slides and cutting long, thin rectangles, or other shapes, using just a scalpel and ruler. She then peeled off the surrounding tape, leaving the shapes stuck to the slide, and covered them with a liquid silicon-based polymer called PDMS. Once the PDMS casts solidified, these were also peeled off and used for plating cells to perform wound-healing assays. Simple microfluidics chambers should be just as simple to make.

“For those labs not set up for microfluidics or photolithography, [the technique] could provide an easy entry into the field,” says Michael Dickey, a chemical and biomolecular engineering professor at North Carolina State University, who was not involved in the study. (Biotechniques, 53:315-18, 2012.)

 

THE METHODS EQUIPMENT REQUIRED HOW IT WORKS TIME TO MAKE MASTER AND REPLICATES COST
Photolithography Photolithography machine, housed in a dust-free clean room Fabricates a master mold from
photo-curable polymer, make replicates from PDMS
1-2 days Around $200,000 for all equipment, plus approx.
$10 for each master
Scotch-tape lithography
Scalpel, ruler, Scotch tape
Fabricate master by cutting Scotch tape into desired design. Make replicates from PDMS 1-2 hours Around $10 for equipment
and $1 for each master

 

 

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: mzamora

mzamora

Posts: 1

March 20, 2013

If the desired resolution is >= 100µm, you can use a MakerBot Replicator 2 3D printer for about $2,300.

Of course, it's more expensive than tape and scalpel, but its 100x cheaper than photolithography equipment, can print out at least a dozen flow cell masters at a time in minutes for less than $1 in materials, and, more importantly, guarantee reproducibility at 100µm resolutions.

There may even be some 3D printer that uses PDMS or some other appropriate material, allowing it to print cells directly, avoiding the mastering step. If that is so, very intricate cells may be designed because there is no mold and assembly step.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies