Advertisement

Speaking of Science

March 2013's selection of notable quotes

By | March 1, 2013

CLONABLE? Harvard researcher George Church ignited a bit of an intellectual firestorm recently when he suggested the possibility of cloning Neanderthals.© DCTIM1/FLICKR

Another technology that the de-extinction of a Neanderthal would require is human cloning. We can clone all kinds of mammals, so it’s very likely that we could clone a human. Why shouldn’t we be able to do so?

—Harvard synthetic biologist George Church on the feasibility of cloning a Neanderthal, from the English translation of a Spiegel Online interview, which was badly misquoted by several news outlets (Jan. 18, 2013)

 

I can create a Neanderthal baby, if I can find a willing woman.

FoxNews.com’s initial distortion of George Church’s comments to German publication Der Spiegel on the technological reality of eventually cloning a Neanderthal (Jan. 21, 2013)

 

We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that our failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms.

Barack Obama, in his inaugural address marking the start of his second term as President of the United States (Jan. 21, 2013)

 

We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now.

—Famed naturalist Sir David Attenborough, in an interview for Radio Times (Jan. 22, 2013)

 

So as 2013 begins, it is clear that critical times lie ahead for the publishing of clinical trials, which may define the relationship between pharmaceutical companies and the public for many years to come.

— The PLOS Medicine Editors, in a recent editorial about making future clinical trials more transparent (January 2013)

 

What really worries me is that it is so hard for virtually anyone to truly act as if there is no free will. And that this can have some pretty bad consequences. . . . But if you devote your time instead to thinking about what the brain, hormones, genes, evolution, childhood, fetal environment, and so on, have to do with behavior, as I do, it seems simply impossible to think that there is free will.

—Stanford University neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky, answering Edge.org’s Annual Question for 2013: “What *should* we be worried about?” (January 13, 2013)

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
RayBiotech
RayBiotech

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist