Advertisement
RayBiotech
RayBiotech

NIH Funding Spat

A Republican representative objects to a study he said is politically partisan.

By | March 7, 2013

NIH Director Francis CollinsNATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTERepublican representative Andy Harris of Maryland raised concerns about the National Institutes of Health’s oversight of its grantees yesterday (March 5), ScienceInsider reported, after reading about an NIH-funded study connecting the rise of the Tea Party to tobacco funding.

Politicians and other officials, including NIH Director Francis Collins, had gathered at a Committee on Appropriations meeting to discuss how federal agencies were dealing with funding cuts. But as the meeting wound down, Harris addressed Collins to complain about the study, which was published last month (February 8) in Tobacco Control.

“They allege that somehow the Tea Party had its origin in the 1980s with tobacco funding, which is pretty incredible because, I mean, I’m a Tea Party guy and I was there when it was established in 2009,” Harris said (see 1:52:30 in this recording of the meeting). He later added, “What kind of methods does the NIH have when this kind of research takes dollars from cancer research?”

“I too am quite troubled by this particular circumstance,” Collins replied. He explained that the study’s author, Stanton A Glantz of the University of California, San Francisco, is a long-time NIH-funded tobacco researcher and had published great work in the past. When Harris asked whether Collins considered the recent paper to be one of these great works, Collins said that he did not.

But when Harris asked Collins what he would do to make sure such politically partisan work was not funded in the future, Collins replied that he struggled with the question. “The tension here is both to recognize that this is an unfortunate outcome but also not to put NIH in the position of basically playing a nanny over top of everything that our grantees do,” he said. “Because a lot of what they do that is more appropriate ends up being quite innovative.”

Glantz, for his part, was “very troubled” by Collins’s response to his work and said he did not have an agenda when he applied for the grant, which described research that would look at the influence of tobacco industry funding on policy-making. “We didn't go looking for the Tea Party,” he told ScienceInsider. “It emerged naturally in the course of the research.”

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: barrybarclay

barrybarclay

Posts: 10

March 7, 2013

The Tea Party Republicans would like to see us in a new dark ages where public polcy is not based upon scientific evidence but is determined by spin doctors with a narrow world view dominated by religous dogma. To them the truth is not something to be shared for the benefit of mankind as most scientists believe. To these Republicancs the truth is something to be suppressed and replaced with a neoconservative truth manufactured and disseminated solely for partisan political gain. This is a good example.

Avatar of: mightythor

mightythor

Posts: 41

March 8, 2013

Many politicians (and not just Republicans) are what I like to call radical utilitarians: they sort of implicitly define "truth" as that which is convenient to their purposes of the moment.   It is the characteristic that leads the general public to regard all politicians as liars, but I think they typically believe the things they say that are in contradiction to what the rest of us consider to be facts.  To paraphrase Shakespeare, "To thine own self be true, and you can then not be false."   They will only recant when their version of the truth becomes a political embarrassment -- and therefore inconvenient.   I have noticed that a number of my acquaintances in the business community share this propensity.  Obviously we are talking about a spectrum here, but I suspect that any person who is extremely goal-oriented -- a characteristic that correlates strongly with success in many fields -- is likely to be fairly far out on the spectrum. 

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
Ingenuity
Ingenuity

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Life Technologies