NIH Warned About Lobbying

A congressman raises concerns that some grants may violate restrictions on federal spending for lobbying.

By | April 1, 2013

Jack KingstonWIKIMEDIA, US CONGRESSThe chair of the House of Representatives spending panel that oversees budget decisions for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has expressed concerns that some NIH-funded research has a political agenda, breaking rules that prohibit the use of tax dollars for lobbying Congress or state legislatures, reported ScienceInsider.

On March 5, Representative Jack Kingston (R-GA) wrote a letter to NIH Director Francis Collins objecting to several grants. For example, one grant awarded to a tobacco control researcher Stanton Glantz of the University of California, San Francisco, included money that was used to trace the origins of the Tea Party movement to groups funded by the tobacco industry. Kingston also cited a small grant awarded to criminologist Catherine Gallagher of George Mason University to produce a review of research on the health issues facing young US prisoners. Referring to a sentence in the project abstract stating that Gallagher would engage with advocacy communities, Kingston wrote that the grant “appears, on the surface, to sponsor an advocacy group for the illegal development of lobbying material.”

Kingston asserted that the NIH must not fund research that addresses political questions or advocacy groups seeking to develop lobbying material, and asked the agency to review all of its grants to ensure they do not break those rules. “I expect any activity that violates these funding restrictions shall be halted,” he said in the letter.

In response, Catherine Gallagher told ScienceInsider that her abstract mentioned advocacy groups merely because only they have access to the prison population, and insisted that she was not lobbying on their behalf. “I think it’s crazy in this climate of scarce resources to waste people’s time on such a trivial matter when we have such a long and dependable peer review process,” she said.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Ken Pimple

Ken Pimple

Posts: 38

April 1, 2013

"Kingston asserted that the NIH must not fund research that addresses political questions." Some political questions have profound health implications. That's NIH's purview, isn't it?

So now NIH has to review all of its grants (currently funded, or future applications?) based on two projects that do not sound like lobbying at all. 

Sheesh.

Popular Now

  1. Gut Microbes Linked to Neurodegenerative Disease
  2. Opinion: WHO’s Silence on Cannabis
  3. Top 10 Innovations 2016
    Features Top 10 Innovations 2016

    This year’s list of winners celebrates both large leaps and small (but important) steps in life science technology.

  4. Infant Microbiome: Vaginal Delivery Versus C-Section
Rockland