Advertisement

NIH Warned About Lobbying

A congressman raises concerns that some grants may violate restrictions on federal spending for lobbying.
 

By | April 1, 2013

Jack KingstonWIKIMEDIA, US CONGRESSThe chair of the House of Representatives spending panel that oversees budget decisions for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has expressed concerns that some NIH-funded research has a political agenda, breaking rules that prohibit the use of tax dollars for lobbying Congress or state legislatures, reported ScienceInsider.

On March 5, Representative Jack Kingston (R-GA) wrote a letter to NIH Director Francis Collins objecting to several grants. For example, one grant awarded to a tobacco control researcher Stanton Glantz of the University of California, San Francisco, included money that was used to trace the origins of the Tea Party movement to groups funded by the tobacco industry. Kingston also cited a small grant awarded to criminologist Catherine Gallagher of George Mason University to produce a review of research on the health issues facing young US prisoners. Referring to a sentence in the project abstract stating that Gallagher would engage with advocacy communities, Kingston wrote that the grant “appears, on the surface, to sponsor an advocacy group for the illegal development of lobbying material.”

Kingston asserted that the NIH must not fund research that addresses political questions or advocacy groups seeking to develop lobbying material, and asked the agency to review all of its grants to ensure they do not break those rules. “I expect any activity that violates these funding restrictions shall be halted,” he said in the letter.

In response, Catherine Gallagher told ScienceInsider that her abstract mentioned advocacy groups merely because only they have access to the prison population, and insisted that she was not lobbying on their behalf. “I think it’s crazy in this climate of scarce resources to waste people’s time on such a trivial matter when we have such a long and dependable peer review process,” she said.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Ken Pimple

Ken Pimple

Posts: 24

April 1, 2013

"Kingston asserted that the NIH must not fund research that addresses political questions." Some political questions have profound health implications. That's NIH's purview, isn't it?

So now NIH has to review all of its grants (currently funded, or future applications?) based on two projects that do not sound like lobbying at all. 

Sheesh.

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
Panasonic
Panasonic

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies