Cancer Institute Frustrated with Leadership

Researchers responding to a survey at MD Anderson Cancer Center report low morale due to their president’s leadership style.

By | April 2, 2013

The eastern part of the UT MD Anderson campusWIKIMEDIA, NIGHTRYDER84 About a third of the MD Anderson Cancer Center’s faculty responded to a survey expressing concern over changes at the institute that include president Ron DePinho’s “dictatorial” style and the departure of more nurturing leadership. The results of the survey were published last week (March 29) in The Cancer Letter.

Approximately 70 percent of respondents said that faculty morale was worse than it was in 2010, citing leadership that was unresponsive to its staff, “top heavy,” and “inefficient.” Events that have been particularly distressing include DePinho’s conflict of interest issues, such as promoting the stock of a company that he co-founded without first disclosing his involvement, as well as the fact that his wife was considered for an $18 million grant for an institute he founded by the beleaguered Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) without scientific review. One respondent wrote of being “so tired of having to answer questions from other Houstonians about why MD Anderson is going downhill,” according to a Nature blog.

However, it is unclear how widespread the dissatisfaction is, since only a third of the faculty responded to the survey.  Some researchers noted that “the complaints of a few have led to inaccurate [media] articles that have unfairly tarnished the institution’s reputation by presenting a false picture of what is actually taking place,” in a response to a different article published earlier in The Cancer Letter.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Popular Now

  1. Broad Wins CRISPR Patent Interference Case
    Daily News Broad Wins CRISPR Patent Interference Case

    The USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board has ruled in favor of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard retaining intellectual property rights covered by its patents for CRISPR gene-editing technology.

  2. Henrietta Lacks’s Family Seeks Compensation
  3. Can Plants Learn to Associate Stimuli with Reward?
  4. Humans Never Stopped Evolving
    Features Humans Never Stopped Evolving

    The emergence of blood abnormalities, an adult ability to digest milk, and changes in our physical appearance point to the continued evolution of the human race.

Business Birmingham