Advertisement

Obama Unveils Brain Project

Starting in 2014, the federally funded initiative will seek to develop new technologies capable of mapping the activity in the human brain.

By | April 3, 2013

NIH Director Francis Collins and President Barack Obama announcing the BRAIN initiativeWIKIMEDIA, CHUCK KENNEDYPresident Barack Obama yesterday (April 2) officially announced plans for a large-scale, government-backed research project to map the human brain, starting with an initial $100 million in federal funds for the development of new technologies that will enable the investigation of how millions of individual brain cells interact, reported BBC News.

Known as Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN), the initiative is designed to have the same transformative effect on brain research—and on our understanding of various brain diseases—as the Human Genome Project did for genetics research. It will begin next year, led by three government agencies: the National Institutes of Health (NIH), The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) and the National Science Foundation (NSF). A working group at the NIH—headed by Cornelia Bargmann of The Rockefeller University and William Newsome of Stanford University—will devise a plan of action, specific goals, and estimates of specific future budgets, reported The New York Times.

Private institutions, including the Allen Institute for Brain Science, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Kavli Foundation, and the Salk Institute for Biology, will also contribute.

Supporters of the project argue that it will spur greater private investment in science and technology, and potentially provide a significant boost for the US economy. “It makes sense to have a brain activity map now because the maturation of an array of nanotechnologies can be brought to bear on the problem,” Michael Roukes, a physicist at the California Institute of Technology, told the NYT.

But some scientists are critical of the plans. David Stein, a neuroscientist at Emory University in Atlanta, told the NYT that developing the technologies first is the wrong approach. “I think the monies could be better spent by first figuring out what needs to be measured and then figuring out the most appropriate means to measure them,” he said. “In my mind, the technology ought to follow the concepts rather than the other way around.”

See an infographic from the White House about the project.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
RayBiotech
RayBiotech

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Hamamatsu
Hamamatsu
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist