Nature Announces Reproducibility Initiative

The journal is sharpening its review of life science papers and giving authors additional space to document more detailed methods.

By | April 25, 2013

NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, DIANE A. REIDThe prestigious journal Nature is making an effort to publish fewer irreproducible papers, it announced in an editorial yesterday (April 24). The journal will get rid of space limitations on Methods sections and will commission statisticians to help review some papers, among other measures.

The announcement follows widespread discussion of how to solve the problem of irreproducibility. “The problems arise in laboratories, but journals such as this one compound them when they fail to exert sufficient scrutiny over the results that they publish, and when they do not publish enough information for other researchers to assess results properly,” the Nature editors wrote.

The journal is encouraging scientists to be more transparent about their data, statistics, and methods, including posting raw data online. A checklist for authors submitting life science papers specifies necessary information about sample sizes, statistical tests, and blinding, among other topics. It also asks researchers to disclose sources and profiles of biologically variable substances, such as cell lines and antibodies.

Additionally, the editorial places blame for irreproducibility on inadequate statistical training for biologists and says that there are insufficient incentives for labs to try to reproduce results, as it is difficult to fund or publish such studies. 

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Popular Now

  1. Genetic Test Solves Royal Mystery
    Notebook Genetic Test Solves Royal Mystery

    Genetic analyses lay to rest conspiracy theories about death of Belgian King Albert I, who lost his life in a rock climbing accident more than 80 years ago.

  2. Investigation Finds Pathologist Guilty of Systemic Misconduct
  3. Bacteria and Humans Have Been Swapping DNA for Millennia
  4. Curious George
    The Scientist Curious George

    George Church has consistently positioned himself at genomics’ leading edge.