Advertisement

Brain Methylation Map Published

The epigenetic modification of brain cells undergoes great shifts over the course of mouse and human development.

By | July 4, 2013

SCOT NICHOLLSResearchers have made an extensive map of several types of methylation in the brains of mice and humans. The work, described in Science today (July 4), shows that epigenetic modification varies greatly over the course of development but is remarkably consistent between individuals and between mice and humans.

“This is the very first full-scale profiling into DNA methylation in the developing brain,” said Paolo Sassone-Corsi, a molecular biologist at the University of California, Irvine, who was not involved in the research. “It basically is a wealth of amazing information for a large number of researchers.”

Study author Margarita Behrens, a neuroscientist at the Salk Institute in San Diego, said she started the project because she wanted to understand the role of epigenetic changes in the brain as mental illnesses took hold in humans. She chose to look at DNA methylation—a process in which methyl groups are added to nucleotides—in the frontal cortex because the brain region is associated with executive function and can show abnormalities in people with mental disorders.

Using whole genome bisulfite sequencing to map methylation of cytosine nucleotides in the frontal cortices of mice, she and colleagues noticed something unusual. Most methylation in adult mammals happens where cytosine and guanine nucleotides sit next to each other on a DNA molecule. This common type of modification is called CG methylation.

Cytosine can also be methylated in locations where it sits next to another nucleotide, but in most regions of the body this non-CG methylation has seldom been observed in differentiated cells. Behrens’s infant mice lacked non-CG methylation in their frontal cortices, but it rapidly accumulated as they aged and their brains developed. “When we found it in the brain we said, ‘What is this doing there?’” Behrens recalled.

The researchers found similar patterns of non-CG methylation accumulation in the human brain and noticed that the modifications accumulated especially rapidly in the first two years of life, a time of rapid synapse formation. Non-CG methylation continued to build through adolescence before decreasing slightly in older subjects. The researchers also noted that non-CG methylation of genes in the same subjects was associated with lower levels of gene expression.

Behrens speculates that the non-CG methylation could help determine the character of neurons during development. “The fine tuning of the expression of the transciptome could be related to the non-CG methylation,” she said.

The researchers also mapped hydroxymethylation, in which a hydroxymethyl group modifies DNA, in mouse and human frontal cortexes. They found that hydroxymethylation primarily occurs at CG sites. Intriguingly, they noted that certain sites with high levels of hydroxymethylation in fetuses were often demethylated in adults.

The patterns of methylation were highly conserved between individuals who were tested and even between mice and humans. “The conservation between individuals is a strong clue [the methylation] may have a meaning,” said Eran Mukamel, a neuroscientist at the Salk Insitute and coauthor of the paper.

Now that she’s mapped the frontal cortex, Behrens hopes to go back to her original goal of understanding mental disease, using her map as a reference.

“It gives us a landscape of the normal pattern of development,” said Mukamel. “It will be interesting for people who want to look at disruptions that occur in psychiatric illness, learning, and memory.”

R. Lister, “Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development,” Science, doi:10.1126/science.1237905, 2013.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: James V. Kohl

James V. Kohl

Posts: 156

July 4, 2013

The epigenetic effects of maternal body odor associated with food odors and nutrient acquisition are genetically predisposed and sexually differentiated. Glucose and pheromones alter secretion of mammalian hypothalamic gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). The species-specific pheromones of the mother elicit an innate increase in GnRH-directed luteinizing hormone and testosterone secretion in male mammals, which does not occur in female mammals. These effects are most pronounced during the first two years of life, but have lasting consequences since they are extend prenatal nutrient-dependent sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior to postnatal pheromone-controlled hormone-organized and hormone-activated behavior via the molecular mechanisms conserved across all species of vertebrates.

The conserved molecular mechanisms have their origins in microbes and are directly linked via ecological, social, neurogenic, and socio-cognitive niche construction and to adaptive evolution during development of epigenetically-effected changes in hormones that also affect invertebrate hormone-organized and hormone-activated behaviors. See for examples: Kohl (2012): Human pheromones and food odors: epigenetic influences on the socioaffective nature of evolved behaviors and Kohl (2013) Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model.

Avatar of: James V. Kohl

James V. Kohl

Posts: 156

July 9, 2013

Conservation of the molecular mechanisms of learning and memory in humans and mice might best be addressed in the context of Epigenetic control of GnRH neurons, since GnRH has been described as the biological core of mammalian behavior.

In the context of epigenetic control of GnRH neurons we see that food odors and pheromones epigenetically alter luteinizing hormone, which links learning and memory in mammals to nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution (e.g., in species from microbes to man, sans mutations theory).

If anyone finds a role for mutations in the physiology of adaptive evolution (e.g., in the physiology of learning and memory), my model could be compared to what may theoretically occur. 

As an alternative, my model could be compared to the biological facts, as Noble indicated should be done in Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology

It would be harder not to rock the foundations of evolutionary biology if they were not so firmly planted in statistical analyses at the population level (i.e., after nutrient selection and controlled reproduction by pheromones have already occurred). However, if you're ready to "rock on," see: Kohl, JV (2013)  Nutrient--dependent / pheromone--controlled adaptive evolution: a model
Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 3: 20553

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Thermo Scientific
Thermo Scientific
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews
Life Technologies