Advertisement
Ingenuity
Ingenuity

The Roots of Monogamy

A new analysis suggests that infanticide drove the evolution of pair living in some primate species, though another study reaches a different conclusion.

By | July 31, 2013

Golden lion tamarins are strictly monogamousWIKIMEDIA, MISTVANScientists trying to explain the evolution of social monogamy in mammals have come up with three leading hypotheses. One holds that two parents are better than one. Another postulates that monogamy is a male mate-guarding strategy that prevents females mating with rival males, especially in species where females are widely spaced so that one male can’t easily monopolize them all. The third contends that it protects against infanticide, where rival males kill offspring to quickly return the mother to a fertile state so they can sire their own offspring.

A study published this week (July 29) in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences supports this third hypothesis, but another study has muddied the waters by yielding findings that back up the mate-guarding theory.

In the first study, University College London anthropologist Christopher Opie and colleagues compiled published data on mating behavior, parental care, and infanticide among 230 species of primate. The researchers then used computer simulations of primate evolution over 75 million years to see how the rise and fall of monogamy correlated with a range of different behaviors.

Opie and his colleagues observed a strong correlation between each of the three factors—long spells of parental care, spatial distribution of females, and infanticide by males—and the rise of monogamy in primates. But infanticide was the only behavior to consistently precede a shift to monogamy, suggesting it could be the key evolutionary driver. “Our analyses clearly show that infanticide is the trigger for monogamy in primates,” Opie told ScienceNOW.

Meanwhile, a separate paper published this week (July 29) in Science came to a different conclusion. Tim Clutton-Brock and Dieter Lukas of the University of Cambridge analyzed data from more than 2,000 mammal species, including but not limited to primates, and found that all but one of the transitions to monogamy arose from scenarios where the females were widely distributed in the habitat. Unable to easily copulate with more than one female, the authors suggest, males were likely guarding mates as a way to maximize their number of offspring. In this analysis, infanticide did not appear to be a driver for monogamy.

Clutton-Brock told Nature that the discrepancy could be due to the two research groups categorizing behaviors in different ways. And Opie pointed out to ScienceNOW that wide spacing among females doesn’t occur in highly social, group-living primates, which might make them a special case among mammals.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Ed M.

Ed M.

Posts: 44

July 31, 2013

Maybe they like each other.

Radical concept, I know.

Avatar of: Steve H

Steve H

Posts: 4

August 5, 2013

These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive and I don't see any reason they can't all be true for some species.  In fact, I expect that we will eventually find that more than one can be true for some species (e.g. a combination of the benefits of having two parents and males controlling access to females).

Avatar of: PD

PD

Posts: 18

August 26, 2013

Let's not ignore the facts from our own species.  Human children do better on all accounts when raised by their biological mother and father.  This fact is not emphasized enough in our society especially when discussing homosexual "mariage.".

Replied to a comment from PD made on August 26, 2013

October 3, 2013

Research indicates that human children do better in an environment with two parents.  There was no distinction made whether the parents were same-sex or not.  There's not enough research or precendece to conclude anything like that.  Children raised by properly nurturing adoptive parents do not show any inherent hinderances because of biology.  But the statistics pertaining to single parent homes supports that multiple parents does show improvement. 

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
Ingenuity
Ingenuity

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
CEM
CEM
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews
Life Technologies