Sequester Hitting Scientists Hard

A recent survey of working researchers highlights funding difficulties and the perceived decline of the U.S. as a leader in science. 

By | September 4, 2013


SXC.HU, MARCELO TERRAZAHistoric cuts to research funding took effect in March with the start of federal budget sequestration. A survey conducted over the summer, released by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB) last week (August 29), offers a sobering look at how federal funding reductions are impacting working scientists.

More than 3,700 scientists, representing all 50 states and a range of disciplines, responded electronically in June and July to questions about funding, training the next generation of researchers, and the United States’ position among global research leaders. “The data shows that deep cuts to federal investments in research are tearing at the fabric of the nation’s scientific enterprise and have a minimal impact on overcoming our national debt and deficit problems,” said Benjamin Corb, public affairs director for ASBMB, in a statement.

More than three-quarters of respondents reported that they were spending more time writing grants but receiving fewer funds this year, as compared with the time before 2010, when federal declines began. According to the ASBMB, only 2 percent of respondents said they were able to make up for those losses with private funds, representing “feeble” private investment in academic research.

In addition, the news release highlighted that an “overwhelming majority of scientists in all fields believes the U.S. has lost its position as the global leader in scientific research.” Nearly 70 percent of scientists surveyed said that they lacked the funds to expand their research programs. More than half of all respondents said they had to turn away promising new talent because of budget pressures, while 46 percent said they were forced to lay off lab members.

Despite the difficulties facing academic research, 95 percent of respondents said they wished to remain in science. Many stressed the potential payoffs to American society of investing in scientific research. “Taxpayer support to science goes directly into the economy, advances technology, and improves the quality our lives,” Paul Ney of the New York Blood Center told the Huffington Post. “It is truly a win-win proposition.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Gottagetanewhat!


Posts: 1

September 5, 2013

Only (Ughh!) $85 billion last year. $110 billion in 2014 and again for each of the next 8 years afterward. Judging by the degree to which research enterprises have been reduced, restricted, and slowed as a result of the first year of this decade long process, I'd say it's fair to say that America’s leadership role in the world's scientific research enterprise will be fully gutted across the board (in many areas, such leadership was already relinquished years ago, e.g., high energy physics). Don't forget, once this resource and economic driving force is carelessly disposed of through lack of foresight and/or petty minded political maneuvering, it may take as long as two generations (30-40 years, think Japan after WWII), to recruit and train new scientists, and rebuild an infrastructure that will no doubt be just as decimated as the pool of scientific talent will be due to the idiotic and mindlessly implemented measure known as sequestration (assuming anyone can be convinced there is a future in pursuing a scientific career in a country with such a fickle and shortsighted attitude towards its best interests and future welfare).

Popular Now

  1. Publishers’ Legal Action Advances Against Sci-Hub
  2. How Microbes May Influence Our Behavior
  3. Metabolomics Data Under Scrutiny
    Daily News Metabolomics Data Under Scrutiny

    Out of 25,000 features originally detected by metabolic profiling of E. coli, fewer than 1,000 represent unique metabolites, a study finds.

  4. Sexual Touch Promotes Early Puberty
    Daily News Sexual Touch Promotes Early Puberty

    The brains and bodies of young female rats can be accelerated into puberty by the presence of an older male or by stimulation of the genitals.