Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews

Lab Tubes Contaminated with Virus

A novel virus thought to have come from human samples appears to have been derived from seawater during the manufacture of tubes used to extract DNA.  

By | September 20, 2013

WIKIMEDIA, ROY PERRYEarlier this year, researchers from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and colleagues published data in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on a newly identified virus, called NIH-CQV, which was present in serum from Chinese patients with seronegative hepatitis. They reported that NIH-CQV was related to parvoviruses and circoviruses with “remarkable genetic heterogeneity within patients,” but it was unclear whether it had any role in the etiology of the patients’ disease.

Skip ahead to last week, and another group—this one based in the United States—reported in the Journal of Virology that this same virus popped up in a number of clinical samples as part of a similar study looking at seronegative hepatitis. Again, the samples were nearly identical to one another in DNA and amino acid sequence, as well as to NIH-CQV. Given that the virus was present in all of the pooled samples, however, the researchers suspected contamination.

Retesting the individual samples, this time using a different technique to extract the nucleic acid, the team no longer found any evidence of the virus. After doing a bit of detective work, the researchers figured out that Qiagen spin columns used for extraction appeared to be the source of the contamination. To try and hunt down where the virus originated, the researchers compared their virus to sequences from a variety of databases, and found similarities among metagenomes sampled off the coasts of California and Oregon. “As the sample processing and generation of these datasets did not involve the use of columns or kits manufactured by Qiagen . . . these findings revealed that [the contaminant] is an environmental virus likely originating in ocean seawater and may have inadvertently contaminated the spin columns during manufacture,” the researchers wrote in their report.

In a statement emailed to The Scientist, Qiagen spokesman Thomas Theuringer said that the company is evaluating its products and will attempt to reproduce the study's findings. He pointed out that for most applications, the potential contamination should not affect results. "For 'deep sequencing' applications, however, as described in the study, a product from the QIAamp UCP product line would be the appropropriate sample preparation kit. It has a 32 times higher purity level compared to standard methods." Customers can exchange their tubes for another product line. "QIAGEN will offer all customers who have purchased a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit or QIAamp UltraSens Virus Kit for their deep sequencing applications to exchange the spin columns at not cost," Theuringer said.

Vincent Racaniello, a virologist at Columbia University, wrote on his virology blog that the study was reminiscent of the situation with XMRV, a retrovirus that was thought to underlie chronic fatigue syndrome, but turned out to be a contaminant from human cells grown in mice. He added that deep sequencing is a powerful tool, but must be carefully controlled, “from the water used to the plastic reagents.”

“Most importantly,” he added, “laboratories involved in pathogen discovery must share their sequence data, something that took place during this study.”

Correction: The original version of this story described the authors of the first paper as Chinese. Just one member of the research team is at a Chinese institution, while most of the other members are at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in the U.S. The article has been updated to more accurately reflect the affiliations.

 

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: EmilyEmilyLL

EmilyEmilyLL

Posts: 1

September 20, 2013

The first paper is actually published by scientists at NIH. When the article mentioned paper published by Chinese researchers, it sounds like it is published by Scientists IN China.

Now I need to check on my qiagen columns.

Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 121

September 20, 2013

How is seawater used in the manufacturing of these?  Would sewage treatment effluent be any better?  :)

Avatar of: wossi

wossi

Posts: 1

September 23, 2013

Using Maxxbond for cleaning the columns (and also for possible reuse of the columns) would have prevented this contamination

Avatar of: KerryGrens

KerryGrens

Posts: 179

Replied to a comment from EmilyEmilyLL made on September 20, 2013

September 23, 2013

Thanks for reading and for pointing out the affiliations. I've made a correction to the post.

Thanks,

Kerry Grens

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews
Life Technologies