Advertisement
Salesforce
Salesforce

New Budget Bill Short Shrifts Science

The omnibus spending bill unveiled by US Congress this week would restore some research budgets cut by sequestration, but critics say it's not enough.

By | January 15, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, KMCCOYThe US Congress rolled out an omnibus $1.1 trillion spending bill on Monday (January 13) that would keep the government in operation through October. The bipartisan bill, which was authored by House Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers (R-KY) and Senate counterpart Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), slates $29.934 billion in funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), a $1 billion increase from the agency’s sequester-wracked 2013 budget.

But this boost isn’t large enough, according to many in the research community. “The FY14 omnibus spending bill falls short of restoring funding for lifesaving National Institutes of Health (NIH) biomedical research,” said Carrie Wolinetz, president of the biomedical science advocacy group United for Medical Research, in a statement. “The proposed package won’t adequately reverse the damage done by last year’s budget sequester and ensure the nation’s biomedical research enterprise makes continued progress in lifesaving research and development.”

The NIH budget increase contained in the spending bill is, in fact, $714 million less than 2013’s “enacted level” of $30.648 billion, according to House Democrats. And the NIH itself reports that if the bill were to pass, the agency would be getting $950 million less than it received in 2012.

Other government science agencies fare better in the new bill. The US Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would both receive boosts to their 2014 budgets. But the National Science Foundation’s budget would be around $7.2 billion—$69 million less than the agency’s pre-sequester budget.

The bill’s failure to fully restore the NIH budget, and build it to reflect past annual increases, sticks in the collective craw of science advocates that lobby for such increases. “Funding for the National Institutes of Health has been kept well below the level of scientific opportunity,” Research!America President and CEO Mary Woolley said in a statement. “We must eliminate sequestration once and for all, and grow our investment in NIH in order to slow and halt the progression of diseases and disabilities ranging from Alzheimer’s to diabetes to traumatic brain injury. But as long as Congress avoids the primary issues fueling our national debt—tax and entitlement reform—it will be difficult to invest robustly in solutions to our problems.”

The Republican-led House is set to vote on the bill’s passage today (January 15). The House passed a short-term funding bill that extended the Senate’s deadline to finish the overall spending bill until Saturday (January 18).

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: pillpoppinpuppy

pillpoppinpuppy

Posts: 1

January 15, 2014

We are $17 trillion in debt. Let's do more with less.

Avatar of: MikeH

MikeH

Posts: 11

Replied to a comment from pillpoppinpuppy made on January 15, 2014

January 15, 2014

Out here in the real world we'll be doing less with less, and with aggressive global competition coming in second means you've lost.

Avatar of: UCLAscientist

UCLAscientist

Posts: 1

January 15, 2014

NIH/NSF spending builds jobs, reduces medical costs, and innovates technology to create even more revenue in the future. Return on investment will help the debt. Now we are just going to let China get ahead of us and reap the benefit.  Why are people in love with reducing the debt instead of loving America?

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews
Life Technologies