Speaking of Science

March 2014's selection of notable quotes

By | March 1, 2014

LIFE’S CRADLE: About 4 billion years ago, in the so-called period of heavy bombardment, Earth was continually subjected to gigantic impacts by chunks of debris left over from the formation of the Solar System. © MARK GARLICK/SCIENCE SOURCE

It is quite certain that there was a moment when life did not exist on our planet, and another moment when it appeared. It is the passage between these two states that forms the great problem of natural philosophy today.

—French naturalist Ètienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, on how life arose from non-life, c. 1836


What is important in the origin-of-life field is understanding the transitions that led from chemistry to biology. So far, I have not seen that efforts to define life have contributed at all to that understanding.

—Nobel laureate Jack Szostak, of Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, on the distinction between origin-of-life studies and the categorization of organisms (February 2012)


How worried are you, if at all, that scientific research into human or animal DNA might lead to scientists “playing god” with things that should remain outside the realm of science?

—A Huffington Post/YouGov poll question to which 72% of respondents answered that they were either “very worried” or “somewhat worried” about the possibility (February 2, 2014)


When we’re talking about origins, we’re talking about the past. . . . We weren’t there; you can’t observe that, whether it’s molecules-to-man evolution or whether it’s a creation account. . . . Creation is the only viable model of historical science confirmed by observational science in today’s modern scientific era.

—Creationist Ken Ham, in his opening remarks at the start of a debate with science communicator Bill Nye on whether or not creationism is a viable model for life’s origins (February 4, 2014)


What keeps the United States ahead, what makes the United States a world leader, is our technology, our new ideas, our innovations. If we continue to eschew science, eschew the process, and try to divide science into observational science and historic science, we are not going to move forward, we will not embrace natural laws, we will not make discoveries, we will not invent and innovate and stay ahead.

Bill Nye, science communicator, in his opening remarks at the start of a debate with creationist Ken Ham (February 4, 2014)


Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: JonRichfield


Posts: 48

March 16, 2014

Bill Nye's comment was the most cogent of the foregoing, but it does not follow that the US is actually staying ahead.
Ken Ham's shows the typical creationist's failure to understand that his views, incoherent as they are, are unambiguously a blasphemy against the very God and scriptures that he claims to worship or at least respect.

Avatar of: Prabodh


Posts: 1

March 19, 2014

Why does Bill Nye still think US is the front runner?

Popular Now

  1. Inside a Lab Mouse’s High-Fat Diet
  2. Battling the Bulge
    Bio Business Battling the Bulge

    Weight-loss drugs that target newly characterized obesity-related receptors and pathways could finally offer truly effective fat control.

  3. How Gastric Bypass Can Kill Sugar Cravings
  4. Birth of the Skin Microbiome
    Daily News Birth of the Skin Microbiome

    The immune system tolerates the colonization of commensal bacteria on the skin with the aid of regulatory T cells during the first few weeks of life, a mouse study shows.

Synthetic Genomics
Synthetic Genomics
Life Technologies