Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews

Making Sense of the Narwhal Tusk

Emerging evidence suggests that the marine mammal’s long front tooth might help the narwhal sense environmental changes.  

By | March 18, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, GLENN WILLIAMSThe function of the single, spiraling tusk of the narwhal, a marine mammal that lives in the Arctic, has captured the imagination of mariners and marine biologists alike. Is it an ice pick? A mate attractor? A paper published in The Anatomical Record today (March 18) indicates that it acts like a long, pointy antenna, picking up signals from the animal’s environment.

“It takes a tremendous amount of energy and devotion to get that thing to grow,” Harvard University’s Martin Nweeia, the lead author of the study, told Wired. “To expend that much energy in such a harsh environment—there has to be a pretty compelling reason to do it.”

The tusk is actually an overgrown, twisted front tooth. In its paper, Nweeia’s group showed that the innervated tooth is porous. When the researchers dipped the tusks of captured narwhals into waters of varying salinity, the whales’ heart rates changed: higher salinities resulted in a faster beat. “This is the first time that someone has discovered sensory function [for the tusk] and has the science to show it,” Nweeia told the BBC.

That the tusk can transmit environmental stimuli is not surprising. “The narwhal tusk is a tooth, and teeth are sensitive,” Kristin Laidre, a marine mammal biologist at the University of Washington, told National Geographic. But although some scientists were “dazzled” by the data, according National Geographic’s The Loom, Laidre was less convinced by the team’s conclusions. “There’s just zero evidence” to support the idea that the narwhal tusk is a sensory structure, she said. Heart rate fluctuations might instead reflect the stress response of the animals to being captured, she explained.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: John Rash

John Rash

Posts: 1

March 19, 2014

Entirely inappropriate for Kristin Laidre to dismiss all of the considerable evidence (anatomical, biochemical, genetic, and physiolgical) with a wave of the hand as "zero evidence". Intemperate, illogicaL, and dismissive of solid research. Sure, anyone can come up with alternative explanations, from whole cloth, and with no experimental support. But to allow such intemperate musings to be inserted into a scientific discussion, without any supporting contadictory evidence, is counter to the established scientific method. There are not "always two sides" to a story, and it is too much like Faux News to create "the other side".

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews
Life Technologies