If you say molecular memory is nonsense, and it does not have any chemical formula. then it has something else that is not able to prove by current existing setup/laboratory/equipment to analyze, measure it.
The scientific community has fixed idea about what is science. If any principle scientifically accepted/proved if and only if has proved in the laborotary of examining the contents of it. Otherwise it is not science or pseudo science, it means it is completely false or supersitution. This is complete failure of science to prove some phenomenon/rule/principle which is occuring in the nature. Don't call this is unscientific, it is just "super science", that we dont have enough equipment to preceive or capture the actually truth behind this prinicple of action with current scientific concepts or laboarotory setup. This requires completely different kinds of setup or setup to understand nature of different kinds of energy like life force energy, etc.
If you think homeopathic diluation can be accepted scientfically if only if it has some chemical evidence. Then first answer my question. The life force energy or vital force (VF) because of which we are alive today and absense of this VF, our body is dead. If you remove the vital force energy from living human body, then the body becomes dead. Can you give chemical formula for this vital force? If so it can be synthesised in the laboroatory and can be injected to dead person to make him alive. Is it make sense as per your scientific idea?
Since we dont have explaination scientifically what is the chemical contents of life force energy, can you call life force energy is false, nonsense, psuedo science, or superstition ????
There are so many such thing in the nature or universe we do not have explanation because we dont have the knowledge, laboratory setup or equipment to analyze and understand this phenonmen. We can only observe its existence/actions and its output.
First you should understand, the science is not complete, what ever we should able to understand or prove the principle of nature, that we are calling as science. what ever phenonemo or activity which is not able prove by material content or evidence is "bigger science" which is still need to explored, but we dont have any fundamental setup for this. From current scientific knowledge you cannot has answer to everything in the nature, like life force energy. It requires completely different though process which is completely radical or opposite to current understanding of science principle. You are tyring to fix the SCIENCE from what ever you know. Like a frog in a well, never seen how big is the ocean, has never has idea of ocean itself, things the well is only existence of water, and ocean is just false idea or nonsense.
The homeopathy is energy medicine which works with life force energy or vital force of body, which is governer or controller of our body to cure any diseases on physical and mental plane. The sameul hahnemann is only person who has understood this life fore energy principle and its application through nature's homeopathy principle.
Sorry I am not here to oppose you, or the current science or allopathy system of medicine, everything good, the current advancement in science is appreciated, but science is evolving, it is not end, there are many things in the nature phenomenon or activity, for which science dont have basic foundation, this is the truth.
The real scientist should think beyond the "science" and try to understand the acutal truth of homeopathy, its efficacy in treating many uncurable physical/mental problems, for which there is no cure in today's allopathy system of medicine. Try to analyze the successful treament and case study of world class homeopaths.
Let these 68 cases be treated by worldclass homeopaths or homeopathy international association and let them prove and certify that these cases cannot cured by homeopathy. Then only this artical has any truth.