Advertisement

Earth’s “Cousin” Found

Researchers pinpoint a distant planet that may be the right size and temperature to support liquid water and life.

By | April 21, 2014

An artist's conception of Kepler 186f IMAGE, NASAIt’s 500 light-years away, but a recently found planet is the closest thing to Earth that astronomers have found yet. “Kepler 186f” is similar in size to Earth and, thanks to its position in the “Goldilocks zone” (neither too far nor too close to the star it orbits), its temperature is likely in the range suitable for liquid water and life. “Kepler 186f is the first validated, Earth-size planet in the habitable zone of another star,” Elisa Quintana of the SETI Institute and NASA’s Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California, said at a news conference announcing the discovery on Thursday (April 17). “It has the right size and is at the right distance to have properties similar to our home planet.” A paper detailing the findings was published last week in Science.

Kepler 186f, named after NASA’s Kepler planet-finding mission, is 10 percent wider than Earth (8,700 miles versus 7,918 miles in diameter) and takes only 130 days to complete one full orbit around its star, a red dwarf that is smaller and fainter than the Sun. Nonetheless, researchers are excited by the prospect that the planet could potentially support life. “This planet is still considered potentially habitable, as long as it has a dense enough atmosphere, even though it receives less light from its star than Mars does from our sun,” Victoria Meadows, an astrobiologist and planetary astronomer at the University of Washington who was not involved in the research, told The New York Times. “It’s fun to note that if the planet is habitable, photosynthesis may be possible.”

Earth-like exoplanets like Kepler 186f have been found before, and researchers still need to learn more about the planet before it can truly be considered a likely place for extra terrestrial life to exist. Researchers have not yet directly observed Kepler 186f, instead using the “transit method,” which detects the presence of a planetary body based on changes in the radiation coming from its star as it passes between the star and the telescope trained on it. So even though its size can be inferred, its mass cannot. “Because you don’t get the mass, you don’t know if it’s a big rock, or a small rock with a big, gaseous atmosphere,” theoretical astrophysicist Brad Hansen from the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved in the finding, told The Washington Post. And it’s not yet known whether Kepler 186f exhibits “tidal locking”—when the same side of the planet always faces its star. “It would have one sunny side and the other would be permanently dark, meaning it wouldn’t have an Earth-like climate,” Penn State University atmospheric scientist James Kasting, who was not a part of the Kepler team, told the Post.

Advertisement
Keystone Symposia
Keystone Symposia

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement
Panasonic
Panasonic

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist
Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist