Advertisement

Unsinkable Evidence

Genetic testing disproves one woman’s claims to have been a survivor of the Titanic disaster.

By | May 1, 2014

ANDZREJ KRAUZE

On a trip to her father’s childhood home in Chesterville, Ontario, in May 2012, forensic scientist Tracy Oost of Laurentian University jumped at the chance to visit an old farmstead formerly owned by the Allison family, which lost three members in the RMS Titanic catastrophe. Oost had long been fascinated by the story of the “unsinkable” ship and, in particular, the research that followed its sinking. “Really, it’s the first mass disaster that was ever investigated to the depth that we investigate mass disasters now,” says Oost, who in 2001 oversaw the exhumation of graves at a cemetery in Halifax, Nova Scotia, to identify Titanic victims believed to be buried there.

For many years, the Allison family has been considered one of the lingering mysteries of the tragic sinking. Only baby Trevor was known to have survived; his parents, Hudson and Bess, and his two-year-old sister Loraine were believed to have gone down with the ship, making Loraine the only child from first or second class to lose her life that fateful night. Hudson’s body was the only one recovered, however, and in 1940, a woman named Helen Kramer appeared on a radio show claiming to be the long-lost Loraine. She said that her father had placed her in a lifeboat just in time, and that she had been raised in England by a “Mr. Hyde,” who Kramer claimed was in fact Thomas Andrews, the Titanic’s designer and builder (also believed to have gone down with the ship). For more than 70 years, Kramer and, some years after her death in 1992, her granddaughter Debrina Woods tried to convince the surviving members of the Allison family that Kramer was the long-lost Loraine, but the Allisons remained skeptical of their claims.

When Oost and her father stopped by the old Allison farmstead in Chesterville, the controversy was still raging, and Woods had recently asked the Allisons for samples of their DNA to prove her relationship to the family. An elderly couple currently occupying the farm knew the Allison family well, and when they learned that Oost was a forensic scientist, the pair was delighted. The couple put the family in touch with Oost, who, after a year of discussions, helped launch the Loraine Allison Identification Project and agreed to oversee a genetic analysis to get to the bottom of the matter. “They finally were just at a point [that they] were prepared to have DNA tests done,” Oost says.

There’s history in DNA, and if you can unlock that history, you can find some very powerful answers.—­Michael Baird, DNA Diagnos­tics Center

Oost says that she was unable to obtain a sample from Woods, but Woods’s sister Deanne Jennings, who had always been skeptical of her grandmother’s and sister’s claims, happily provided a little saliva. Sally Kirkelie, the granddaughter of Bess Allison’s sister, Maybelle, also submitted a sample. Because mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is passed from generation to generation through the female line, Kirkelie and Bess Allison would have both inherited the same mtDNA from their mothers, and Bess would have passed her mitochondrial genome on to Loraine. If Helen Kramer’s claims were true, Jennings should also share the same mtDNA. The test, then, was simple: analyze the mitochondrial genomes of Kirkelie and Jennings to see if they matched.

Oost had the samples sent off to the DNA Diagnostics Center in Fairfield, Ohio, where researchers conducted analyses of three hypervariable regions in the mtDNA. The test revealed no link, suggesting that the available historical evidence had been right all along: Loraine Allison had died the night the Titanic sank. “DNA really tells a story,” says Michael Baird, laboratory director at the DNA Diagnostics Center. “There’s history in DNA, and if you can unlock that history, you can find some very powerful answers.”

But Woods and her supporters, including Hudson and Bess Allison’s great-niece Carol Tonyan, are still not convinced. They suspect that the DNA test was tampered with somehow (though Woods declined to give details at the advice of her legal counsel) and are actively pursuing a second DNA analysis. “There’s much to be suspect about that [test],” says Woods, who is in the process of writing a book detailing why she thinks the Allison family would go to such great lengths to cover up the truth. “Our documentation paints a completely different story.”

But Oost is losing patience. “At some point [Woods is] going to have to accept the fact that there’s a valid DNA test that says she’s wrong.”

Clarification (May 5): This story has been updated from its original version to clarify that Oost did not send the saliva samples to DNA Diagnostics herself. Rather, the company acquired the samples directly to ensure that the tests have an unbroken chain of custody. The Scientist regrets any confusion.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: mightythor

mightythor

Posts: 41

May 17, 2014

No evidence is ever so conclusive that it convinces everyone.  There will always be deniers.  Max Planck is supposed to have said "Truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents, but rather because its opponents eventually die."

Avatar of: BobD

BobD

Posts: 20

May 21, 2014

If I read the story correctly, you would have to be suspicious that Woods apparently asked the Allisons for a DNA sample to confirm the family relationship, but was in turn unwilling to provide her own sample to a third party for the testing she sought.

Avatar of: vm123456

vm123456

Posts: 35

May 21, 2014

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
? Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

 

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies