Advertisement
Bethyl Laboratories
Bethyl Laboratories

STEM Students Benefit from Active Learning

Classroom techniques that require student involvement boost grades more than traditional classroom lectures, an analysis finds.

By | May 14, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, XBXG32000So-called “active” learning may help students fare better grade-wise than classic lectures, according to a meta-analysis of 225 studies published this week (May 12) in PNAS. A team led by Scott Freeman of the University of Washington found that undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses  with a lecture-only format were one-and-a-half times more likely to fail than were those in classes involving some form of active learning.

Active learning, while not strictly defined, can include using clickers to gauge student responses, asking students to split into active group workshops, and calling on individuals randomly. Using an active learning approach improved students’ grades by about 6 percent, on average, and could even bump an individual student a full letter grade higher.

“This is a really important article—the impression I get is that it’s almost unethical to be lecturing if you have this data,” Eric Mazur, a physicist at Harvard University who uses active learning techniques, but was not involved in the work, told ScienceNOW. “It’s good to see such a cohesive picture emerge from their meta-analysis—an abundance of proof that lecturing is outmoded, outdated, and inefficient.” 

Others, like former sociology professor Frank Furedi, criticized the study’s approach of splitting classes into lecture-only and those that employed any type of active learning, who called it a “false polarization.”

“Only an idiot would rely entirely on lectures—that hasn’t happened for 200 years,” he told Inside Higher Ed. “The art of teaching is getting that balance between giving the lectures creatively to impart information and organizing more intensive interactive discussions with students, in different formats.”

Advertisement
The Scientist
The Scientist

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Mounthell

Mounthell

Posts: 19

May 14, 2014

How can this come as a surprise?

Avatar of: mpoultry

mpoultry

Posts: 2

May 14, 2014

 

 

I would like to know not percentage changes in grades -- a somewhat fanciful measure of performance and retention, but performance on content-based standardized STEM exams, like the MCAT or the GRE area-specific exams.  Otherwise, it becomes a story about archers painting bulls-eyes around their arrows wherever they fall.

 

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Mettler Toledo
Mettler Toledo
Advertisement
Life Technologies