NIH to Close Sex Gap in Preclinical Research

The funding agency will require grant applicants to address sex balance in all future cell and animal studies.

By | May 15, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, NHGRI, MAGGIE BARTLETTThe National Institutes of Health (NIH) will soon ask grant applicants to include both male and female animals or tissues in preclinical research funding proposals, according to a policy announcement published this week (May 14) in Nature by Francis Collins, NIH director, and Janine Clayton, the agency’s associate director of Research on Women's Health.

It has become clear in the last few decades that men and women respond to drugs differently. Clayton used the recent finding that women respond differently to nicotine patches as one example. “Using male animals and cells is by and large the status quo right now,” she told The Verge, despite the fact that “sex is a fundamental variable that should be considered from the very start.” Scientists often use male mice by default partly because it was how they were trained in animal research, but also because of fears that the hormonal cycles of female mice might introduce extra variability to the data.

The changes to preclinical research funding proposal requirements will be rolled out in phases, the first beginning in October. “To help scientists understand and adapt to the changing policies, we will create training modules on experimental design,” Clayton told The Verge. “We will also monitor compliance with new policies and perform data analysis to track our progress.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Popular Now

  1. UC Berkeley Receives CRISPR Patent in Europe
    Daily News UC Berkeley Receives CRISPR Patent in Europe

    The European Patent Office will grant patent rights over the use of CRISPR in all cell types to a University of California team, contrasting with a recent decision in the U.S.

  2. What Budget Cuts Might Mean for US Science
    News Analysis What Budget Cuts Might Mean for US Science

    A look at the historical effects of downsized research funding suggests that the Trump administration’s proposed budget could hit early-career scientists the hardest.  

  3. Opinion: On “The Impact Factor Fallacy”
  4. Unstructured Proteins Help Tardigrades Survive Desiccation
Business Birmingham