Advertisement
NeuroScientistNews
NeuroScientistNews

Carpe Carp!

Can putting invasive species on the menu contain troublesome animals and plants?

By | June 1, 2014

BON APPETIT: A filet of bighead carp, one of the Asian carp species that has invaded North American waterwaysSWAPAN PHOTOGRAPHY/SHUTTERSTOCK

Charlie and Rover skip back and forth across an aluminum boat idling in a lake connected to the Illinois River near Frederick, Illinois, on a chilly April morning. The father-and-son pair of chocolate labs howls with excitement as Clint Carter, a big, affable guy who runs Carter’s Fish Market in Springfield, reaches overboard to grab part of a gill net he had set the night before. Arm over arm Carter drags in the net, and along with it, big, bloody, flopping carp. Twenty minutes later he’s finished hauling in two 200-yard-long nets and is standing knee deep in a 1,500-pound pile of fish. “If this were over the summer, it would be 10,000 pounds,” he says.

This stretch of the Illinois River—once commercially fished for catfish and a genus of carp-like fish called buffalo—is chock-full of invasive carp originally introduced from Asia. Carter can’t remember it any other way. Asian carp were brought to the southern U.S. decades ago to clean retention ponds, but floods allowed the fish to escape and spread throughout natural waterways, where they quickly dominated their new environs and outcompeted native fish for food. The biggest concern now—aside from getting whacked in the face by the silver carp, which are notorious for their aerial shenanigans—is that they will make it into the Great Lakes, where they could potentially decimate native fish populations. Carter proposes ridding waterways of the alien fish by harnessing a force that has had unintended success at reducing populations of countless other species, from bluefin tuna to diamondback terrapins: cultivate a human appetite for invasive carp.

When we decide something is pretty good to eat, we run right through it.—­Jackson Landers, hunting educator

Others agree. “When we decide something is pretty good to eat, we run right through it,” says Jackson Landers, a hunting educator and author of Eating Aliens. “There’s definitely precedent for human beings deciding to hunt something down in a systematic way, especially if we apply industrial harvesting methods.”

The idea of eating invasive organisms has developed a bit of a cult following in the past few years. Joe Roman, a conservation biologist at the University of Vermont, edits the blog Eat the Invaders, which hosts recipes for introduced species, including wild boar, periwinkle snails, kudzu, and nutria.

Ecologist Andrew Deines developed a recipe blog with his fellow graduate students at the University of Notre Dame. Deines had been studying invasive tilapia in Zambia and got interested in the idea of eating invasives when he was doing fieldwork. “For many fisheries people, you may not be considered a real scientist until you’ve eaten your study organism,” says Deines, now a postdoc studying invasive species at Michigan State University. The group decided that a good way to raise awareness about the problem of invasive species would be to appeal to people’s culinary interests. The blog, Invasivore, now includes cooking instructions for bullfrog leg piccata, deep-fried earthworm, and garlic mustard frittata, among others.

CATCH OF THE DAY: This 60-lb bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) was caught in the Mississippi River.COURTESY OF CLINT CARTERLike Roman, Deines sees his advocacy more as an effort in raising public awareness than as a vehicle for actually eradicating an invasive species. “What we can do is weird things on the Internet, you know, eat Chinese mystery snails—[so people] become more aware of invasive species,” Deines says. “By doing that we might be able to influence some policies or . . . actions people are doing in order to prevent invasive species from being introduced in the first place.”

There are scant data showing that targeted efforts encouraging the eating of an invasive species can actually reduce its populations, but a few anecdotal experiences do lend the idea credence. Roman was in Cuba with students recently, and after spending five days in the water, they saw only one lionfish. In contrast, any scuba diver in Florida would likely encounter swarms of the invasive fish around coral reefs. Roman points out that the Cuban government has promoted eating lionfish, and perhaps that explains the difference. Deines also notes that invasive Nile perch in Africa’s Lake Victoria eventually became a lucrative fishing industry, and populations of the fish began to crash after a couple of decades of intense harvesting.

“Before we get really excited, we have to start thinking about the economic side of this and the potential drawbacks,” Deines cautions. Setting up a market for a species makes it valuable, “and you create strong incentives to keep it around.”

Landers isn’t so worried that creating a market for an invasive species could backfire. He points to a classic economics theory, the tragedy of the commons, in which any shared resource with value will ultimately be depleted. “Any economist will tell you, when you have a public resource, as long as policy does not limit the take,” it will be depleted, he says.

The first step in fishmonger Carter’s evangelizing is to reverse the public’s aversion to eating Asian carp. A few carp processing plants have popped up in the Midwest, but the American palate has largely rejected the bony meat. Carter says that’s because nobody knows how to prepare it right, but he’ll fry it up for anyone who asks, and has done cooking demos for restaurants in Illinois. At his fish shack in Springfield, he deep-fries his catch of the day to convince me that invasive carp is actually good. Taking my first bite, I think of how few native species we pulled from those nets; of how invasive carp have ravaged rivers and lakes in the Midwest; of the devastation that could occur if they succeeded in getting to Lake Michigan. And that morsel of carp tastes all the sweeter.

Advertisement

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Matt Chew

Matt Chew

Posts: 4

June 2, 2014

It's easy to presume that the correlation between increasing numbers of carp and decreasing numbers of formerly common fishes means the carp are causing the problem. The way American rivers have been managed for the past century has fundamentally altered their physical characteristics and (therefore) their habitat value. At the moment, the Illinois River and many other midwestern rivers are now really good habitat for silver and bighead carp, probably for a variety of reasons. At the same time, and only partially because they're good for carp, they are less good habitat for their former "natives." There's less (or no) "there" there for those species now.  Apparently some people would rather have no fish than the "wrong" fish, even though the fact that the carp species are so abundant is pretty strong evidence that they are the "right" fish under prevailing condtions. Calling them "wrong" is not a biological finding. It's a nostalgic longing. The river doesn't care about any of that. Neither do the fish.    

Avatar of: JohnnyMorales

JohnnyMorales

Posts: 6

June 3, 2014

In China they already consider the fish good eating, so why not also develop an export industry around the fish.

 

That in combination with developing a native demand for the fish would ensure it faced the same fate as any fish we decide we like to eat. ;)

 

And since the Chinese think the fish is a good fish to eat, exploring the Chinese recipes for cooking them would no doubt ensure when we ate the fish we'd find it incredibly delicious just like most Chinese food is.

 

(those that hate Chinese cooking excepted LOL)

Avatar of: bradc

bradc

Posts: 1

June 7, 2014

I like the idea of selling carp to Asians in Asia, but there may be lots of Asian restaurants in the US who could be approached.

Also there is a huge market for fishmeal for animal consumption and for fertilizer.. since a small percentage of the body of the fish is easily prepared for human consumption. I'm not just talking about canned catfood. Commercially grown livestock, or even fish farms (poetic?) are a market for edible protein. 

Some people already eat carp.  I think gefilte fish are european carp.

Come on America, we are no longer so rich that we can afford to ignore a BIG source of pretein that a big chunk of humanity has already learned to use.

 

 

Avatar of: Mellow Guy

Mellow Guy

Posts: 2

July 4, 2014

Gefelte fish or fish balls would be another way to prepare carp.

Carp are good when smoked which makes the bones easier to remove.

 

Avatar of: CSYJ

CSYJ

Posts: 1

July 4, 2014

Instead of focuing on huiman consumption, what's wrong with "catfish as cat chow" (pun intended), ;-)?  Hey Purina as you listening?

Follow The Scientist

icon-facebook icon-linkedin icon-twitter icon-vimeo icon-youtube
Advertisement

Stay Connected with The Scientist

  • icon-facebook The Scientist Magazine
  • icon-facebook The Scientist Careers
  • icon-facebook Neuroscience Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Genetic Research Techniques
  • icon-facebook Cell Culture Techniques
  • icon-facebook Microbiology and Immunology
  • icon-facebook Cancer Research and Technology
  • icon-facebook Stem Cell and Regenerative Science
Advertisement
Advertisement
Life Technologies