Predatory Journal Trading on Former Name

Experimental & Clinical Cardiology, a once well-respected journal, now is publishing anything that comes with a payment of $1,200.

By | August 26, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, BRYAN BRANDENBURGThe Canadian scientific journal Experimental & Clinical Cardiology used to publish well-founded studies in the field and was widely read within the cardiology community. But since being sold and moved offshore in 2013, the journal is now publishing anything submitted along with a fee of $1,200, packaging spurious studies as serious scientific papers.

A reporter from the Ottawa Citizen provided evidence that Experimental & Clinical Cardiology has gone down the tubes by submitting a manuscript under the nonsensical title, “VEGF Proliferation in Cardiac cells Contributes to Vascular Declension.” The manuscript plagiarized the main text from a published article on HIV, replacing each mention of “HIV” with the word “cardiac,” and included blank graphs. The supposedly “peer-reviewed” journal published the paper.

The journal’s previous owner, Pulsus Publishing Group, sold Experimental & Clinical Cardiology last year. Former publisher Robert Kalina told the Ottawa Citizen that he sold the journal to some “strangers from New York,” who subsequently resold it to an unknown party. The new owners claim to be in Switzerland, but according to the Ottawa Citizen, the $1,200 publishing fees are routed to a bank in Turks and Caicos “We don’t have a clue who these people are,” Kalina told the paper. “It is very sad.”

Roger Pierson, a University of Saskatchewan medical professor, used stronger words to describe the decline of the journal and its sketchy publishing practices. “This seems like a good way to make an income without doing anything, and defraud the academic/scientific/medical community all at the same time,” he told the Ottawa Citizen. “The sad part is that we have to wade through this crapola . . . to get the good papers . . . It’s an enormous time waster and that time is funded, in essence, by the taxpayers of the world.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Barry@DataSense


Posts: 23

August 26, 2014

It is time for Journals themselves to have some sort of peer review process evaluation and stamp.

Too often now papers are peer reviewed by incestuous groups of reviewers who review each other's submissions.

Secondly, journals (and granting agencies) are now often soliciting peer review evaluations from fresh PhD graduates who lack the experience, breadth of knowledge and wisdom to properly evaluate and constructively criticise submissions they receive.

Popular Now

  1. GM Mosquitoes Closer to Release in U.S.
  2. Effects of Neanderthal DNA on Modern Humans
  3. Flux and Uncertainty in the CRISPR Patent Landscape
  4. Do Pathogens Gain Virulence as Hosts Become More Resistant?