Neanderthals As Abstract Thinkers?

Cave markings thought to have been carved by Neanderthals suggests they were expressing abstract thought.

By | September 3, 2014

IMAGE COURTESY OF CLIVE FINLAYSONGorham’s Cave in Gibraltar is home to what’s being called the “first known example of an abstract pattern.” Researchers reported in PNAS this week (September 2) their discovery of a cluster of hashes and lines thought to have been engraved by Neanderthals about 39,000 years ago.

“Originally, we could not quite believe what we had found and had to convince ourselves it was real,” Gibraltar Museum director Clive Finlayson, who led the study, told National Geographic. “Is it art? Is it a doodle? I don’t know, but it is clearly an abstract design.”

The criss-crossed lines occupy a small patch of cave—just 300 square centimeters (118 inches). The nature of the deep cuts appear deliberate and careful, rather than unintentional. The excavation suggests Neanderthals might have had the capacity for symbolic thought.

“We will never know the meaning the design held for the maker or the Neanderthals who inhabited the cave but the fact that they were marking their territory in this way before modern humans arrived in the region has huge implications for debates about what it is to be human and the origin of art,” Paul Tacon, an expert in rock art at Australia’s Griffith University who was not involved in the study told the Associated Press (AP).

Clive Gamble, an archaeologist at the University of Southampton in the U.K.  cautioned that it’s possible the markings could have come from modern humans. “What is critical, however, is the dating,” Gamble told the AP. “While I want Neanderthals to be painting, carving and engraving, I’m reserving judgment.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Miguel Vicente

Miguel Vicente

Posts: 3

September 3, 2014

They were sending a tweet :-)

Avatar of: wctopp


Posts: 110

September 3, 2014

Most modern humans carry Neanderthal genes, some more than others and not always the same ones.  It would be interesting to screen a large number of ethnic groups to create a complete catalog of exactly how much of the Neanderthal genome has been preserved in modern humans.  Once we've got that we can ask WHY these have been preserved i.e. why were these Neanderthal genes better than what we had?  It's just possible that we'll find that genes (for instance) that are involved in our ability to think abstractly are, in fact, exactly those we've inherited from the Neanderthals.  Perhaps early humans were in fact the brutish neo-apes that overran and exterminated the far more refined Neanderthal populations and we improved ourselves greatly by interbreeding before they went extinct.

Avatar of:

Posts: 1

September 8, 2014

300 square cm is about 45 square inches, which would be about 7 inches on a side if square.  Much different than "118 inches."

Popular Now

  1. Consilience, Episode 3: Cancer, Obscured
  2. RNAi’s Future in Drug-Target Screening
    News Analysis RNAi’s Future in Drug-Target Screening

    A recent CRISPR study contradicted years of RNA interference research on a well-studied cancer drug target. But is it the last nail in the coffin for RNAi as a screening tool? 

  3. A History of Screening for Natural Products to Fight Cancer
  4. Streakers, Poopers, and Performers: The Wilder Side of Wildlife Cameras