Compound Confounds C. elegans Aging Research

A drug commonly used in experiments on the model organism can skew the results of aging studies, researchers show.

By | February 22, 2016

C. elegansWIKIMEDIA, KBRADNAMScientists studying the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans—an important model organism in aging research—often use a chemotherapy drug called FUdR to sterilize the worms and prevent them from laying eggs. But this drug may also affect the worms’ lifespans, calling the results of many aging studies into question, according to a paper published yesterday (February 22) in Mechanisms of Ageing and Development.

“There were very different effects in published papers that had different doses of FUdR in them,” study coauthor Anne Hart of Brown University said in a statement. “We can explain a lot of the disagreement in the C. elegans aging field by realizing that FUdR can dramatically change the answer.”

Examining FUdR’s mechanism-of-action in C. elegans, the researchers found that in addition to mediating nematode reproduction, the drug triggers a stress response and activates pathways of DNA repair—two processes that are often the subjects of study in aging research. With these pathways switched on, treated worms are better able to survive stressors such as high salinity, high heat, or low oxygen.

What’s more, when the researchers carried out their own aging experiments while taking into account the dose of FUdR, they found that the drug could dramatically alter the results. For example, one stressful environment that appeared to increase the C. elegans lifespan by 30 percent when FUdR was present in fact reduced lifespan when the drug was absent.

“We didn’t expect to have this happen,” Hart said in the statement. The results support a re-examination of published results on FUdR-treated C. elegans, she added.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Popular Now

  1. How Plants Evolved Different Ways to Make Caffeine
  2. Thomson Reuters Predicts Nobelists
    The Nutshell Thomson Reuters Predicts Nobelists

    According to citation statistics, researchers behind programmed cell death pathways and CRISPR/Cas9 are among those in line for Nobel Prizes this year.

  3. Sequencing Reveals Genomic Diversity of the Human Brain
  4. Reviewing Results-Free Manuscripts
    The Nutshell Reviewing Results-Free Manuscripts

    An open-access journal is trialing a peer-review process in which reviewers do not have access to the results or discussion sections of submitted papers.

RayBiotech