Genetically Engineered Hornless Dairy Calves

By | May 10, 2016

calvesFLICKR, PAUL DUNLEAVYUsing transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), researchers at Recombinetics, a St. Paul, Minnesota–based biotech company that uses genetic technologies for agriculture and biomedicine, inserted an allele for the POLLED gene into the genome of bovine embryo fibroblasts. They then used somatic cell nuclear transfer to clone the genetically engineered cell lines and implanted the embryos into recipient mother cow. Five calves were born, two of which are still living; Spotigy and Buri are now 10 months old. None of the calves had evidence of horn buds, suggesting that the genetic manipulation had worked, according to a letter published last week (May 6) in Nature Biotechnology.

This feat of genetic engineering could avoid the need for dehorning of dairy cattle, an operation completed for the safety of the animals and their handlers. Hornlessness (known as “polled”) is a trait common in beef cattle, but rare in dairy cattle. Conventional breeding could theoretically create hornless dairy cattle, but it would take decades, with milk production traits being compromised in the process. “Producers have been wanting to get rid of this trait for a long time, and it just takes too long” using traditional breeding methods, Recombinetics’s Scott Fahrenkrug told The Scientist in 2014.

The new calves represent a new way forward—using geneediting technologies like the TALENs used in this work or the ever-growing suite of CRISPR/Cas tools to breed hornless dairy cattle. Importantly, Fahrenkrug and his colleagues saw no off-target effects. “The same results can be accomplished by classical breeding, and with the same gene, but would take five to six generations of crossing and backcrossing and almost 20 years to accomplish,” Purdue University geneticist William Muir said in a statement sent to reporters.

“Although Spotigy and Buri could serve as founders for dissemination of polled genetics into the dairy industry, they also represent proof that introgression of [a POLLED allele] into elite animals could be used to eliminate the need for dehorning,” Fahrenkrug and his colleagues wrote in their letter. “This solution to the dehorning problem would be economically viable and could potentially improve the welfare of cattle in the United States.”

Of course, the applications of new gene editors extend beyond cattle, Muir noted. “Gene-editing technology also opens the field for other improvements in animal wellbeing, such as tail docking in pigs,” he said in the statement.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: N K Mishra

N K Mishra

Posts: 58

May 12, 2016

You are removing a trait for which artiodactyla are known. To remove a characteristic  feature is unfair, and a selfish design.

 

Avatar of: Bovinity

Bovinity

Posts: 1

May 15, 2016

Instead of viewing it as selfish and unfair, how about thinking of the millions of calves that will not have to undergo cauterizing of their hornbuds which is an unpleasent process for calf and handler alike.  

Major improvement in animal welfare in my mind!  I suspect a bovine would also prefer this method over "getting to keep it's horns" if given the choice.  Horns are used in predator defense primarily but in the domestic situation, they get protection from humans and the horns mainly cause injury to conspecifics and handlers.

Removing a critical characteristic needed for survival or comfort, on the other hand, would have welfare implications and should not be considered.

Popular Now

  1. Antarctica Is Turning Green
  2. How to Tell a Person’s “Brain Age”
  3. Male Fish Borrows Egg to Clone Itself
  4. Life Science Funding Cuts Leaked
    The Nutshell Life Science Funding Cuts Leaked

    According to a document posted online less than a day before the release of the official 2018 budget proposal, the National Institutes of Health could face even deeper cuts than previously suggested by the Trump administration.

AAAS