Funders Back Centralized Bio Preprint Server

Major research funding agencies lend their support to an ASAPbio-led effort to streamline the banking of non–peer-reviewed manuscripts in the life sciences.

By | February 13, 2017

PIXABAYThe US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.K.’s Wellcome Trust are backing a consortium of biologists seeking to build a life science preprint server to rival the arXiv server that physicists have been using for decades. Today (February 13), ASAPbio issued a call to establish what it’s calling a “Central Service” to house life-science manuscripts that have not yet been peer reviewed. The NIH, the Wellcome Trust, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and several other major biomedical research funders around the world have announced their support for the project.

“The landscape could become fragmented very quickly,” Robert Kiley, head of digital services at the Wellcome Trust told Nature. “We want to find a way of ensuring that, although this content is distributed far and wide, there’s a central place that brings it all together.”

Kiley was likely referring to the fact that life scientsts currently have many preprint server options to choose from: bioRxiv for biology, a quantitative biology section on arXiv, ChemRxiv for chemistry, and PsyArXiv for psychology, to name but a few. ASAPbio’s Central Service would try to bring all life-science preprints under one roof.

But not everyone is convinced that such an effort is necessary. As Rutgers University molecular biologist Richard Ebright tweeted: “There is no need to reinvent wheel. BioRxiv exists...and *fully* and *completely* meets needs of field.”

Although the specifics of ASAPbio’s requested server are yet to be determined, the consortium aims to get life scientists thinking about publishing their work more like physicists, who tend to put manuscripts up on arXiv before submitting the works to peer-reviewed journals.

See “Scientists Buck Opposition to Preprints in NIH Grant Applications

See “Do Preprints Belong in Grant Applications?

See “Social Media Accelerates Science

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Popular Now

  1. Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal
    News & Opinion Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal

    My “colleagues” and I at the fictitious Arthur Vandelay Urological Research Institute were surprised to find our bogus “uromycitisis” case report swiftly accepted, with only minor revisions requested.

  2. Consilience, Episode 3: Cancer, Obscured
  3. March for Science: Dispatches from Washington, DC
  4. Record-Setting Corn Grows 45 Feet Tall