Reactions to Proposed EPA, NIH Budget Cuts

Experts discuss how Trump’s budget proposals could affect federally employed and federally funded scientists.

By | March 3, 2017

WIKIMEDIA, MATT WADE PHOTOGRAPHYScientists employed or funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and other federal agencies are now awaiting official word on proposed budget cuts that the Trump administration will reportedly deliver to Congress.

See “Trump’s Budget May Cut Science Funding

According to Reuters, the Trump administration plans to cut the EPA budget by around 25 percent, and the agency’s staff by around 20 percent. “The Trump administration wants to cut spending by EPA’s Office of Research and Development (ORD) by more than 40 percent from roughly $510 million to $290 million, according to sources that have seen preliminary directives from the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB),” Science reported. As E&E News noted, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has expressed concern about some of the programs reportedly targeted for steep cuts. “I am concerned about the grants that have been targeted, particularly around water infrastructure,” Pruitt told E&E News.

“This budget is a fantasy if the administration believes it will preserve EPA’s mission to protect public health,” former EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said in a statement (via The Washington Post). “It ignores the need to invest in science and to implement the law. It ignores the lessons of history that led to EPA’s creation 46 years ago. And it ignores the American people calling for its continued support.”

Meantime, in an interview with STAT News, Representative Tom Cole (R-OK) said he would be “very disappointed” were Congress unable to increase the NIH budget. “I think that’s one of our goals, to try to get back to a period where there was a predictable and sustainable increase,” Cole said. “Whether or not people really understand the magnitude of the cuts we’re talking about is not clear to me,” Cole told STAT. “I would expect the secretaries in the affected agencies are pushing back right now.”

See “Science Policy in 2017

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: True Scientist

True Scientist

Posts: 59

March 3, 2017

Tracy produced another piece with carefully selected quotes from former EPA employees. Sure, the new budget is a fantasy of the administration believes. It ignores the science, the law, the history lessons, and the American people... After discovering such crimes it is probably time for the impeachment call. Tracy, please, don't miss it!

Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 225

March 6, 2017

Here's the most appropriate "reaction", "Directly because of this, people are gonna die."  Whatever one's political or religious views, suck on that thought for more than a while.  Then act.  And make sure no one dies because of certain political dogma.  There are a whole lot better places to push one's political agenda than with the EPA's budget which does impact everyone, from all political parties,  extremely personally.

Popular Now

  1. Running on Empty
    Features Running on Empty

    Regularly taking breaks from eating—for hours or days—can trigger changes both expected, such as in metabolic dynamics and inflammation, and surprising, as in immune system function and cancer progression.

  2. Athletes’ Microbiomes Differ from Nonathletes
  3. Mutation Linked to Longer Life Span in Men
  4. Gut Feeling
    Daily News Gut Feeling

    Sensory cells of the mouse intestine let the brain know if certain compounds are present by speaking directly to gut neurons via serotonin.

AAAS