© IKUMI KAYAMA/STUDIO KAYAMA
EDITOR’S CHOICE IN CANCER BIOLOGY
P. Falletta et al., “Translation reprogramming is an evolutionarily conserved driver of phenotypic plasticity and therapeutic resistance in melanoma,” Genes Dev, 31:18-33, 2017.
In melanoma, tumor cells generally adopt one of two phenotypes: proliferative or invasive. A switch from the first to the second often leads to metastasis and a poorer prognosis. But how this switch gets flipped has been a puzzle for some time—one that Colin Goding, a cancer biologist at Ludwig Oxford in the U.K., has been working on for more than a decade.
A recent clue came from his lab’s discovery that human and mouse melanoma cells are particularly sensitive to glutamine, which is often low in melanoma tumor cores. Supplied with the amino acid, cultured cells ramped up levels of a transcription factor, MITF, associated with melanocyte proliferation. But when cells were starved of glutamine, MITF levels dropped and cells became invasive. “This got us thinking: Why is glutamine so important?” says Goding. “What’s it doing?”
To find out, Goding and his colleagues took a closer look at gene-expression patterns from glutamine-starved cells. They found that, in addition to lowering MITF levels, starvation triggered large-scale translational reprogramming via inhibition of translation initiation factor eIF2B. Artificially inhibiting eIF2B—mimicking starvation—induced invasiveness in melanoma cells, while using drugs to render the protein insensitive to inhibition prevented invasiveness even in low-nutrient conditions.
This response is intuitive, Goding notes. “It’s what other organisms do,” he says. “Bacteria become invasive when they starve, yeast put out hyphae. Maybe invasion in general is a property of cells which are starving.” Indeed, similar invasion-promoting reprogramming mechanisms, the researchers showed, operate in yeast, which lack MITF but possess eIF2B. Under nutrient stress, wild-type yeast invaded agar gel, while mutants with disrupted eIF2B interactions did not.
Although the findings suggest evolutionary conservation of invasion drivers, they don’t tell the whole story; melanoma, Goding explains, can become invasive in vivo even in nutrient-abundant conditions. So the team began searching for signals in the tumor microenvironment that might trigger the same response, independent of food supply.
One candidate was tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa), a cytokine released by immune cells. The team discovered that, in culture, TNFa promoted an invasive phenotype very much resembling that of hungry cells—a result mirrored in gene-expression data sets from mouse models of melanoma. In effect, melanoma hijacked cells’ intrinsic starvation response, Goding says, reprogramming them to migrate irrespective of nutrient levels.
And that’s not all. The team also found that cells with this invasive phenotype showed gene-expression profiles consistent with a poor response to certain immunotherapies—a result that may help to explain why some of these treatments are ineffective in a substantial number of patients.
The findings add to an “integrated picture” of melanoma progression, says Corine Bertolotto of the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research. Although steps in the pathway are still missing, “the authors are pulling together complex parts of the puzzle.”