Report Confirms Widespread Great Barrier Reef Bleaching

Aerial survey results reveal severe coral bleaching across much of the massive reef system.

By | April 11, 2017

GREG TORDAThe bleaching of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef continues to be the worst such event in recent memory, according to a report from researchers at James Cook University, released yesterday (April 10). Last June, the team found that the subsiding El Niño had affected more than 90 percent of the reef, making it “the sickest we’ve ever seen,” Bill Leggat, associate professor with the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, told The Scientist at the time. Now, aerial surveys covering the entire reef system have revealed that, while bleaching had been most severe in the northern third, the middle third now has the most intense coral bleaching.

“The combined impact of this back-to-back bleaching stretches for 1,500 km (900 miles), leaving only the southern third unscathed,” Terry Hughes, director of James Cook’s ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, said in a press release. “The bleaching is caused by record-breaking temperatures driven by global warming. This year, 2017, we are seeing mass bleaching, even without the assistance of El Niño conditions.”

This year’s aerial surveys imaged more than 8,000 km (5,000 miles) of the Great Barrier Reef, allowing the researchers to score nearly 800 individual coral reefs. The same approach has been used to examine the effects of three previous bleaching events in 1998, 2002, and 2016. Last year, these data were supported by underwater surveys, which were published last last month.

“The significance of bleaching this year is that it’s back to back, so there’s been zero time for recovery,” Hughes told The Guardian. “It’s too early yet to tell what the full death toll will be from this year’s bleaching, but clearly it will extend 500 km south of last year’s bleaching.”

With bleaching events becoming more common, the reef system will have less time to rebound. “This is really scary, because the Great Barrier Reef is losing its insurance policy,” Boston University marine biologist Randi Rotjan told New Scientist. “The scale of the devastation means that it is losing its potential to reseed the parts of the reef that were previously damaged.”

See “Changing Oceans Breed Disease

ARC CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR CORAL REEF STUDIES

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Barry@DataSense

Barry@DataSense

Posts: 18

April 12, 2017

According to the details given in this article, it is clear that the reef is not in danger but is in fact growing at an exceptional rate. The authors imply that the reef is some 8,000 Kilometers long - whereas on the latest Google map it is only about 1,800 kilometers long (note that the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park is longer).

Or did they fly up and down the full extent of the reef four times?

And, having now looked at the videos and images the authors have put on the JCU drop box site, I am having trouble accepting their claims as to the percentage of corals that have bleached (I have a little experience here - i started studying coral reef ecology over 50 years ago).

Popular Now

  1. Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal
    News & Opinion Opinion: Why I Published in a Predatory Journal

    My “colleagues” and I at the fictitious Arthur Vandelay Urological Research Institute were surprised to find our bogus “uromycitisis” case report swiftly accepted, with only minor revisions requested.

  2. Consilience, Episode 3: Cancer, Obscured
  3. March for Science: Dispatches from Washington, DC
  4. Record-Setting Corn Grows 45 Feet Tall
AAAS