Noncoding RNA Helps Cells Recover from DNA Damage

Scientists discover transcripts from the same gene that can express both proteins and noncoding RNA.  

By | May 1, 2017

TWO-FACED: mRNA (left, red) from the ASCC3 gene is mostly in the cytoplasm, while ASCC3’s noncoding RNA (right, red) is in the cell nucleus (blue). LAURA WILLIAMSON AND BRADLEY SPENCER-DENE

The paper
L. Williamson et al., “UV irradiation induces a non-coding RNA that functionally opposes the protein encoded by the same gene,” Cell, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.019, 2017.

Damaged DNA
When its DNA is damaged, a cell activates genes to repair the lesion and slows down the transcription of many others. According to Jesper Svejstrup of the Francis Crick Institute, researchers have known about this response for a few decades. However, “that was the extent of what we knew,” he says.

Two for one
Last year, Svejstrup and colleagues identified factors associated with transcription-related changes after UV-induced DNA damage, including the transcription of ASCC3, which encodes a protein involved in regulating gene expression (Cell Rep, 15:1597-1610, 2016). In their latest study using sequencing analysis, they discovered that normally long ASCC3 transcripts became much shorter after damage.

Functional see-saws
Knocking down the short ASCC3 transcript produced after UV exposure prevented the cell from recovering normal levels of transcription. “Without the short isoform of ASCC3, you can no longer respond correctly to DNA damage, and cells die,” Svejstrup explains. Blocking the long version, on the other hand, increased transcription levels after UV irradiation. “It’s interesting because the same gene, ASCC3, is producing two opposed [functions],” says Alberto Kornblihtt, a molecular biologist at the University of Buenos Aires who was not involved in the work. “If the protein is made from the long pre-mRNA, then global transcription is repressed. But if the short RNA is made, it helps recover transcription hours after damage.”

Uncovering mechanisms
How the short isoform aids repair remains unknown. “The most logical, simple explanation is that the [noncoding RNA] counteracts the protein encoding form,” Svejstrup says. “Perhaps [it] binds to ASCC3 protein—but we haven’t been able to get clear evidence for that [yet].”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: James V. Kohl

James V. Kohl

Posts: 427

May 8, 2017

There is clear evidence that femtosecond blasts of UV light repair DNA in the context of energy-dependent changes in the microRNA/messenger RNA balance and autophagy, which protects all organized genomes from virus-driven energy theft and the degradation of messenger RNA.

The failure to integrate the Nobel Prize winning works of Ben Feringa (Chemisty 2016) and Yoshinori Ohsumi (Physiology or Medicine 2016) prevents theorists from linking what organisms eat to their pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in the context of Schrodinger's claims in "What is Life?"(1944) and this claim by Roger Penrose in the reprint edition:

"How often do we still hear that quantum effects can have little relevance in the study of biology, or even that we eat food in order to gain energy?" (Roger Penrose 8 August 1991)

See also: From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior  In our section on molecular epigenetics, we wrote:

Small intranuclear proteins also participate in generating alternative splicing techniques of pre-mRNA and, by this mechanism, contribute to sexual differentiation in at least two species, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans...

The food energy that is linked from alternative splicing techniques of pre-mRNA to the chemistry of protein folding and the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in all living genera seems to be largely ignored by those who are not Nobel Laureates.

Popular Now

  1. A Coral to Outlast Climate Change
  2. Antarctica Is Turning Green
  3. First In Vivo Human Genome Editing to Be Tested in New Clinical Trial
  4. How to Tell a Person’s “Brain Age”
AAAS