Texas Education Board Reaches Compromise on Science Standards

The state’s board of education approves new standards that ease up on having students dig into scientific issues relevant to “intelligent design” arguments.

By | April 24, 2017

PIXABAY, WOKANDAPIXAmong many changes to Texas’s science-teaching standards, the state board of education has approved language that subtly scales back how much students will have to explore theories on the origins of DNA and cellular complexity—issues some were concerned would lead students out of science and into religious territory. The unanimous vote last Friday (April 21) was supported by both religious groups and pro-science organizations.

“This is an important victory for science, for science education, and most importantly, for Texas students,” Kathy Miller, president of Texas Freedom Network, which advocates against the inclusion of creationism in science curricula, said in a press release. “The culture wars have no place in our classroom, and today’s decision is one important step toward this board recognizing that.”

See “Science Teaching Standards up for Revision in Texas

At issue was the use of the word “evaluate” in expecting students to consider scientific explanations for DNA’s origin and cellular complexity. Instead, students will “compare and contrast” or “examine” these ideas, the state’s education board decided.

“‘Evaluate’ means you rank these scientific explanations in terms of how adequate they are, how complete they are, how many problems exist with them, what the evidence for each of the alternatives are,” Ronald Wetherington, a Southern Methodist University professor who served on a committee to advise the board on streamlining standards, told The Texas Tribune. “It takes a long time to do compared to just describing them.”

According to the National Center for Science Education, standards that focus on particular phenomena in the fossil record (and often pointed to as a vehicle for creationist discussions) remain.

Texas Values, an organization that promotes “biblical, Judeo-Christian values” likewise saw the language as a victory because it goes beyond requiring students to merely identify explanations for life’s origins. “Today’s vote was another strong confirmation that Texas teachers and students retain the ability to have critical discussion and open debate on the theory of evolution and the origin of life,” David Walls, the director of operations for the group, said in a statement.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 234

April 27, 2017

Doesn't the theory of evolution say nothing about the origin of life per se?  That is, how the very first life began and not all life?  There is great debate and little certainty about how life actually began in the first, simplest of microrganisms.  Trying to link them makes no sense.  However, once established on Earth the evolution of life is easy to discuss and understand.

Popular Now

  1. Decoding the Tripping Brain
  2. Tattoo Ink Nanoparticles Persist in Lymph Nodes
    The Nutshell Tattoo Ink Nanoparticles Persist in Lymph Nodes

    Analysis of the bodies of deceased individuals can’t determine what effect these tattoo remnants have on lymph function, but researchers suggest dirty needles aren’t the only risk of the age-old practice.

  3. Do Microbes Trigger Alzheimer’s Disease?
  4. Metabolomics Data Under Scrutiny
    Daily News Metabolomics Data Under Scrutiny

    Out of 25,000 features originally detected by metabolic profiling of E. coli, fewer than 1,000 represent unique metabolites, a study finds.

AAAS