Peer-Review Fraud Scheme Uncovered in China

The Chinese government finds almost 500 researchers guilty of misconduct in relation to a recent spate of retractions from a cancer journal.

By | July 31, 2017

© BRYAN SATALINOAfter a sweeping research misconduct investigation, China’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MST) has found nearly 500 researchers guilty of engaging in a peer-review fraud scam. Announced late last week (July 27), MST’s findings indicate that 486 scientific paper authors engaged, to some degree, in a scheme to nominate either fictitious or paid peer reviewers who would write positive reviews of their manuscripts.

“We should eradicate the problem from its roots,” He Defang, director of MST’s regulatory division in Beijing, tells Science.

MST is meting out stiff penalties to the guilty researchers. These range from suspending their research projects and canceling grants to rescinding promotions or even harsher retribution. “They will face punishment according to the Communist Party of China discipline regulations and the regulations on personnel from public institutions,” He told Chinese news outlet Xinhua.

The nature of the scam is not unprecedented, with Chinese authors being accused of similar practices in the recent past.

See “The Past and Present of Reseach Integrity in China

The investigation was sparked by the retraction of 107 papers—many of which were authored by Chinese scientists and were published between 2012 and 2016—from Tumor Biology in April. The MST found that of the 521 authors it investigated, 11 were innocent, and 24 are still under investigation. The agency also determined that nine of those papers contained completely faked data and that 95 of the papers involved third parties providing phony reviews.

Of the 486 researchers found guilty of misconduct, 314 were characterized as “neglecting the management of academic achievements and paper publications,” according to Xinhua.

Many in the scientific community within China are praising the government’s efforts to root out fraudsters, including its stated zero-tolerance stance on research misconduct. MST’s recent disciplinary action “reminds us that 'zero tolerance' toward academic dishonesty needs further strengthening, and the actions by the Chinese government are very timely,” Yong-Guan, a biogeochemist at the Institute of Urban Environment in Xiamen, China, tells Science.

(Hat tip to Retraction Watch)

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: JonRichfield

JonRichfield

Posts: 132

August 28, 2017

A healthy trend... I hope.

In the West of course nothing of the sort is possible.

Popular Now

  1. Symmetrical Eyes Indicate Dyslexia
  2. German Scientists Resign from Elsevier Journals’ Editorial Boards
  3. Germany Sees Drastic Decrease in Insects
  4. Swapping Cigarettes for Vaping
    The Scientist Swapping Cigarettes for Vaping

    New evidence suggests e-cigarettes are not without risks to human health, but can be useful in getting people to kick their smoking habit.

RayBiotech