|
|
||||
|
"Ricki Lewis' Law"
The Scientist 2004, 18(15):10
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
The Closing Bell for July 5 was headlined as a lament for the passing of eponyms in science.[1]
It is unlikely that we will soon dispose of Mendel's Laws or Avogadro's Number. If scientists are jealous about being properly cited in bibliographies, that is a large step towards an eponymic tradition. There may be less of the natural history and surprise observation in science today, but there is no lack of theoretical synthesis that might invite the dignity of being inscribed as a "Law."
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|