|
|
||||
|
RNAi's Minor Setback
Researchers continue to wrangle over off-target effects
Email: Aileen Constans - aconstans@the-scientist.com The Scientist 2005, 19(12):22
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
RNA interference seemed poised to transform functional genomics and therapeutics with the 2001 publication of a paper by Tom Tuschl and colleagues showing that 21-base-pair (bp) RNA duplexes silence mammalian genes in a sequence-dependent manner.[1]
Though prior research demonstrated the effectiveness of double-stranded (ds)RNA as a posttranscriptional gene-silencing tool in plants and nematodes, its use in mammals was limited by the fact that dsRNAs larger than 30 bp can activate the interferon response through a PKR kinase-mediated pathway. After Tuschl's research was published, RNAi scientists were optimistic that so-called short interfering (si)RNAs were the answer to this problem.
|
(continued >>)
To continue reading this full article, you must be a subscriber to The Scientist.
You are only a few minutes away from unlimited access.
Subscribe to The Scientist to get unlimited access to our premium content
Get unlimited access to this article and over 20 years of The Scientist archives. You won’t miss a word – all for as little as $4.95. Subscribe now.The Scientist offers site licenses to institutions and organizations. Recommend us to your librarian and get online access through your place or work or study.