|
|
||||
|
Rethinking Clinical Proteomics
After setback, biomarker researchers continue to debate the use of mass spectrometry in diagnostics
Email: Aileen Constans - aconstans@the-scientist.com The Scientist 2005, 19(18):20
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
For a while it looked as if proteomics' next frontier was the clinic, if one was to believe the hype surrounding a 2002 study from US Food and Drug Administration scientist Emanuel Petricoin III and National Cancer Institute scientist Lance Liotta. The pair and their team used mass spectrometry and pattern-recognition software to probe serum samples for ovarian cancer biomarkers. Their findings suggested that proteomic patterns – series of peaks in mass spectra representing unidentified peptides or low molecular-weight protein fragments – could be used to diagnose early ovarian cancer with surprising accuracy.
|
(continued >>)
To continue reading this full article, you must be a subscriber to The Scientist.
You are only a few minutes away from unlimited access.
Subscribe to The Scientist to get unlimited access to our premium content
Get unlimited access to this article and over 20 years of The Scientist archives. You won’t miss a word – all for as little as $4.95. Subscribe now.The Scientist offers site licenses to institutions and organizations. Recommend us to your librarian and get online access through your place or work or study.