TheScientist.com - Magazine of the Life Sciences, Every Day, Online
  Please Login or Register
  • Home
  • Community
  • Current Issue
  • Browse Archive
  • Careers
  • Video & Multimedia
  • Subscribe

Front Cover
Advertisement
Front Cover
Supplements
  • Life Sciences in
    the Greater
    Phila. Region
  • Schizophrenia
  • NC: State of the Life Sciences
  • Autoimmunity


Survey Series
  • Best Places to Work
  • $alary $urvey
  • Lab Web Site and
    Video Awards

The Scientist Daily
  • Science headlines delivered daily.
    Register today.

For Advertisers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Ad Team
  • 2009 Media Kit



by William Wells

RESEARCH ROUND-UP

Identifying the Black Death
'Suicide' PCR of DNA remnants from tooth pulp has confirmed that medieval Black Death was caused by Yersinia pestis.

Email: William Wells - wells@biotext.com
News from The Scientist 2000, 1(1):20001110-02

Published 10 November 2000

In just four years in the mid-fourteenth century, the medieval pandemic of 'Black Death' killed 17-28 million Europeans, or 30-40% of the total population. Further resurgences later in the century eliminated 90% of the households around Montpellier in southern France. It is in this region that Raoult et al. went searching for the causative agent of the Black Death. Although this agent has been presumed to be Yersinia pestis, the pattern of the disease's spread has led others to suggest alternative agents. In the November 7 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Raoult et al. use 'suicide' PCR to amplify DNA remnants of Yersinia pestis from tooth pulp, thus providing evidence that Yersinia was the agent of Black Death (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:12800-12803). The teeth came from a grave that is dated to the time of the pandemic, and termed a 'catastrophe' grave because it contains multiple skeletons that lack shrouds. As such it is likely to have been used for Black Death victims. Dental pulp is a source of DNA free from natural contamination, and the absence of positive controls and use of new primers for each reaction lowers the chances of false positives. Attempts to amplify DNA from other infectious agents from the same samples were not successful.


Not yet registered? Get free access
 

The article you are attempting to read is Premium content which is only available to our online subscribers.

 
 

Email

Password

> Forgot Password?
> FAQ
> Subscribe

 
Not yet registered? Get free access
 

Subscribing to The Scientist is easy and inexpensive.

 

And you can choose from many options. Try us out with an online day pass starting at only $4.95. Or, get it all with unlimited online access to The Scientist Archive and door-to-door delivery of our monthly print magazine.

 
  Not yet registered? Get free access  
 

The Scientist also offers site licenses to institutions and organizations. When your librarian adds The Scientist to the library's collection, you can get unlimited online access through your place of work or study.
Recommend The Scientist today

 



About TS | Contact | Advertise | Editorial Advisory Board | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2008 The Scientist