Tools and techniques for tracking mammalian behavior.
Even the seemingly simplest mammalian behaviors, such as grooming one’s
offspring, involve a complex series of tiny movements that may be invisible to the human
eye. But in studying those behaviors, how to break them down into reliable, measurable
components?
“All of these advances in technology give us data that
[weren’t] available one to two years ago.”
Defining, quantifying and assessing mammalian behavior is a thorny problem.
Besides a shift in thinking to incorporate the complexity of animals’ actions,
“it really takes a great deal of experience and some training to approach
behavior work correctly,” says Mark Kristal, a psychologist at the University
of Buffalo in New York. Scientists come across a number of challenges in imaging and
measuring behaviors in the lab and field. For one, testing or observing behavior can
interfere with the behavior itself. In studying maternal behaviors in rats, researchers
have too much to measure and less than 21 days in which to do it. Assessments of fearful
behaviors such as freezing can be variable among different scientists. And researchers
who conduct field studies at night may not even be able to see the animals they study.
The Scientist talked to several researchers who have implemented
technologies or strategies to capture mammalian behaviors. Here’s what they
said:
Unhindered Movement
User: Detlef Heck, associate professor of
anatomy and neurobiology, University of
Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
Project goal: Tracking a natural movement
in mice
Heck studies how the cerebellum controls
movement, and licking is one movement
shown to be regulated by the cerebellum.
Standard licking tests involve depriving an
animal of water overnight and recording its
drinking patterns the next day. The method is
not useful for examining spontaneous control
of movement because it makes mice anxious,
Heck says. He was interested in the natural licking behavior of an undisturbed mouse. "I
wanted to be able to get a measure of spontaneous
behavior plus a measure of their
long-term water consumption," he adds.
Heck built a set-up in which mice move
freely in a cage with constant access to water.
When the mouse visits its water spout for a
drink, contact between the tongue and spout
induces a tiny blip in voltage that is recorded
onto a computer. Heck uses software to
analyze the number of licks per visit, lick speed,
and the frequency of visits, among other
things. The system cost him about $10,000;
it consists of an analogue digital converter
(~$5000), a computer (~$700), data analysis
software ($2500), and cage materials.
It also helps to choose the right type of
movement. Wayne Aldridge, a psychologist
at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor,
studies the link between movement and
electrical activity in brain regions such as
the basal ganglia. In order to correlate the
firing of a neuron to a single movement, that
movement must be repeated so that you can
create an average representation of the neuron's
electrical activity. But, says Aldridge,
in movement research, equating one motion
with another is tricky. Rodents tend to have
consistent patterns of grooming, within and
between animals, so he uses grooming as a
measure of movement. "We don't have to
train the animals or teach them," he says.
Tips:
• You don't need fancy technology to analyze
movement. For example, some researchers
analyze a mouse's gait by dipping its paws
in ink and watching it walk across a white
sheet of paper. "It's more important to
spend time to think about ways to quantify
natural behaviors," Heck says.
• No two movements are the same, but you
can choose movements that are relatively
consistent, such as grooming.
Naїve Mothers
User: Joseph Lonstein, associate professor
of neuroscience and psychology, Michigan
State University, East Lansing
Project goal: Measuring postpartum
anxiety in mice
Rats show reduced anxiety after their pups
are born, a phenomenon that may be important
for the series of chores—such as building
nests, retrieving pups, and nursing—that
mothers face soon after delivery. Lonstein
studies how the brain regulates this reduction
in postpartum anxiety. Behavioral differences
between anxious and relaxed animals,
though, are not very noticeable while moms
are tending to their pups.
In order to assess anxiety more directly,
Lonstein and his group chose a well-established
anxiety task called the elevated plus maze.
Parts of this maze are enclosed by walls, while other parts lacking the walls leave the rat
exposed to bright light on a platform that's
almost two feet off the ground. Compared
with relaxed rats, anxious rats will stay in the
enclosed portion for longer periods of time.
"One thing that's unique [about studying]
postpartum animals is that you have 21 days
of lactation," he says. "You've got a narrow
window of time to test what you want." That
means if you're trying to collect multiple
measures on a single animal, such as maternal
behaviors, along with anxiety or depression,
you have to move fast. What's more,
the animal will become more anxious as it
repeatedly participates in different tasks—
which may make it more difficult to track
anxiety in different cohorts, he says. He thus
must use more pregnant and lactating rats,
but limit his studies to one task per animal.
For those who want to study maternal
actions in relaxed animals, new situations—
such as a new maze or task—can interfere with
measures of maternal behaviors, says psychologist
Mark Kristal at the University of Buffalo in
New York. "One of the things we emphasize in
my lab is to habituate the animals very carefully
to the procedures," he adds, for example, by
handling them before they become pregnant.
Tips:
• Because maternal behaviors change so
rapidly even within the pups' first month of
life, use consistent timing when collecting
data in different cohorts.
• If you're looking to study anxiety in naïve
animals, choose your first task carefully. If
you need to run repeat tests, prioritize the
measures that are most important to you.
• To study maternal behaviors in relaxed
rather than anxious animals, expose them
to new testing situations several times the
week before testing.
Night Vision
User: Nickolay Hristov, assistant professor of life sciences, Winston-Salem State
University and the Center for Design Innovation, North Carolina
Project goal: Visualizing
behaviors that occur in the dark
At 5 p.m. in Carlsbad Caverns National Park in New Mexico,
visitors trickle out of the caves that are home to thousands of bats. No one was certain
exactly what they did in the dark cavern because light from researchers’ headlamps
and flashlights would perturb the animals’ natural behavior.
Hristov, working as a
postdoc with Thomas Kunz and colleagues at Boston University, obtained thermal infrared
imaging technology, which was originally developed for military use. Using the technology,
they were able to see the bats in total darkness and record their movement—in
blobs of color—from just 15 meters away, in the dark. Researchers attempting to
study this cave-dwelling species have wondered about the size of the colonies, and how the
individuals navigate in the presence of many other bats. Kunz’s group found that
the number of the bats in caverns fluctuates by as much as a million, depending on the time
of year. On a daily basis, the colonies appear to expand and contract to help adjust to
ambient temperatures (Integr Comp Biol. 48:50–59, 2008).
Much of the
work was done using single camera views, but “creative camera placement [of three
thermal infrared cameras] can give a lot of information,” Hristov says. The
researchers are now placing the cameras in specific positions in order to track flight
trajectories in three-dimensional space.
To examine wider (kilometer-scale) distances of
movement in the field, researchers might consider global positioning system telemetry tags
that can accurately trace a bat’s flight route, allowing researchers to infer when
it is eating or drinking. In some cases the data are overlaid onto geographic information
system maps so that researchers can see the environmental context of the behavior.
“In our studies, we know the specific tree branch the bat was using throughout the
night,” says Ran Nathan, professor of ecology at the Hebrew University of
Jerusalem. “All of these advances in technology give us data that
[weren’t] available one to two years ago.” The tags run Nathan about
$900 to $1500, and depending on species and application, are good for a few days when
researchers sample the animal’s location once per second. Unfortunately, many of
the units cannot be recovered.
Tips:
• Thermal infrared imaging and other imaging
methods can be combined with 3D analysis to study collective group behavior not only in bats
but in species ranging from butterflies to elephants, Hristov says.
• When
considering telemetry and other field studies that capture aerial movement, don’t
forget to account for the properties and dynamics of the atmosphere; consult an atmospheric
scientist. Similarly for biologists studying sea animals—consult an oceanographer.
Computerizing Fear Factors
User: Marcelo Wood, assistant professor of neurobiology and behavior, University of
California, Irvine
Project goal: Standardizing a measure of learning and memory
Fear
conditioning—a technique in which researchers teach animals to connect a neutral
stimulus, such as a tone, with an aversive stimulus, such as a foot shock—is a
well-established way to investigate the mechanisms of learning and memory. As a postdoctoral
researcher studying learning and memory in mice, Wood noticed a lot of variability in the
field among scientists’ assessments of fearful behaviors, such as freezing.
“Scoring freezing or other fear-related behaviors is very subjective, and each
person will do it differently,” he says. “The other thing is that
it’s extremely time consuming.” Wood started his own lab in 2006, and he
wanted to prevent such variability.
Wood researched several different companies who sold
automated systems for tracking motion, ultimately settling on Ethovision software (Nolus
Information Technology, Wageningen, the Netherlands) because it can be directly connected to
test chambers that allow the user to control when to deliver electrical shocks to the
bottoms of the cages. The software can also be used to study other learning and memory
paradigms. The system samples the cage every few seconds, and at each time point, tells
researchers whether the animal is moving. The set-up cost Wood about $15,000 in 2006.
Even
with the sophisticated set-up, Wood’s group still had to spend 3 months tweaking
variables because the software is designed to analyze movement, not learning or fear.
“The main problem is, how do you tell a computer what a freezing mouse looks
like?” he says. “It seems like a simple thing, but the computer can
mistake a mouse that’s relaxed and not moving for one that’s
scared.” In order to make it work, the group took the same dataset and repeatedly
ran it through Ethovision, adjusting sampling rates, pixel thresholds, and other settings,
until the software spit out data statistically indistinguishable from those collected by a
human observer (J Neurosci Methods 178:323–26, 2009).
Tips: • When you first start using motion-tracking systems, expect to spend at least a
month tweaking settings to fit your experimental paradigms.
• Talk to researchers
who have worked out these specifics before you. Many labs have published papers on automated
scoring techniques, Wood says.