A tale of two tigers


Caspian (top) and Siberian (bottom) tigers.
Bottom: Jochen Ackermann / wikimedia

In reeds tinged red in the Central Asian sun, a tiger once roamed. There, in riparian forests that line rivers like the Vakhsh in the former Soviet country of Tajikistan, the Caspian tiger (Panthera tigris virgata) prowled, awaiting the passage of a wild boar or Bukhara deer. Although still a matter of debate, the final wild Caspian tiger may have been killed in February, 1970, shot in Hakkari Province, Turkey. New DNA evidence, however, has added a hopeful postscript to this seemingly tragic tale.

In the early 20th century, the Russian government instructed its army to exterminate all tigers as part of a land reclamation project across Central Asia. Once Caspian tigers were almost gone, farmers moved in, clearing wetlands and forests and planting crops like cotton. The tigers retreated, first from lowland streams and finally from marshes around larger rivers.

Carlos Driscoll, a biologist at the University of Oxford’s Wildlife Conservation Research Unit and the US National Cancer Institute’s Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, first became interested in Caspian tigers in childhood. “I remember the tigers being declared extinct, and thought it was so wrong that this could have happened.” Decades later, he wanted to resolve questions about the taxonomy and biogeography of the tigers, long-standing unknowns. He wondered: Why not look at the mitochondrial DNA from museum specimens? (mtDNA is the tool of evolutionary studies in part because it evolves several times faster than nuclear-coding loci.)

The Caspian tiger may not be extinct, after all.

Researchers at museums in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Azerbaijan were willing collaborators. “They were happy to see work done on animals that were painstakingly collected and often underappreciated,” says Driscoll. Except for one Caspian tiger housed in the Moscow Zoo but originally taken from the wild in Iran, the 20 specimens came directly from places like the banks of the Ili River in Kazakhstan and the Piandji River in Tajikistan.

The scientists compared the Caspian tiger samples to all other existing tiger subspecies in a phylogeny that includes leopards and clouded leopards. They found that a major mtDNA haplotype of Caspian tigers and their close relatives, the still-living Siberian, or Amur, tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) of the Russian Far East, differs by only a single nucleotide. (PLoS ONE 4(1):e4125, 2009) This finding suggests the two subspecies are too genetically similar to be considered separate subspecies, the authors say. “The tigers are too closely related to be two subspecies,” Driscoll says. “They’re in fact one.” Pronouncing the Caspian tiger extinct, he believes, may have been premature. The paper “sets forth a noncontroversial and accepted conclusion based on mtDNA evidence,” says Ron Tilson, a biologist and director of conservation at the Minnesota Zoo in Minneapolis who has conducted extensive research on tigers. “The amount of data and number of samples analyzed for this study make the conclusions well supported,” agrees George Amato, director of the Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics and Center for Conservation Genetics at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, via email.

Some 10,000 years ago, Caspian tigers used a trail between the Himalayan Plateau and the Mongolian Gobi desert—the Gansu corridor—to migrate from eastern China to the region around the Caspian Sea. Eventually they returned across northern Asia to eastern Russia, ultimately establishing a new population that came to be called Siberian tigers. Through prehistory, Caspian and Siberian tigers intermingled, then stopped within the last 200 years, likely a result of an increasing human presence in the region. Until that point, they shared geography, natural history, and a common genetic heritage.

The findings raise the possibility of repopulating a now tigerless Central Asia with Siberian tigers, according to Tilson. “The most important consequence of these results,” he says, “is that in the right habitat, the Caspian tiger’s former range is open to reintroduction with Siberian tigers.”



Advertisement


 

Rate this article

Rating: 4.58/5 (48 votes )





reply to: why reintroduce?
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2009-11-13 21:24:18]
to dale dupont,

You are right that reintroduction of tigers should be done with much thought. Especially because conservation of tigers is now about so much more than tigers.

Tiger conservation efforts have recently adopted a "landscape approach" that seeks to preserve all trophic levels naturally present. Vast areas that once supported tigers, such as Central Asia, are currently not part of tiger conservation efforts--simply because there are no tigers there.

This research may initiate discussion and contingency planning for reintroduction of appropriate tigers to their historic natural habitat in Central Asia, providing a larger conservation framework for the entire region.

Tiger landscapes would benefit from several add-on effects, including filling a vacant ecological niche at the top trophic level, and increasing biodiversity and restoring ecological balance.

A number of "tiger parks" in states in the Caspian tiger's former range retain their status as protected areas (such as Tigrovaya Balka in Tajikistan), and may benefit from the favorable attention reintroduction would bring.

Because small populations are susceptible to extinction when restricted to a single site, translocated populations (moving a few Siberian/Amur tigers from the Russian Far East to Central Asia) could provide the subspecies with a geographically removed "second homeland"--insurance against the effects of infectious diseases or local declines in prey.

In terms of your concerns about people, where a tiger is conserved, ultimately so is the place in which it--and often, we--live. In a world facing global warming, habitat loss, and many other issues, tigers are us.



why reintroduce?
by dale dupont

[Comment posted 2009-11-10 20:21:59]
Here in Wisconsin and across the USA they have reintroduced large predators. Wolves and mountain lions are back in some of their former ranges. Beautiful yes, but they are also killing farm animals, family pets and kids. Mountain lions have attacked and killed more than one person in California and other places. Humans are not as high on the food chain as one might think unless they are armed. Even then you would not scare away an animal, you would have to defend yourself. There must be much wisdom in where these animals are brought back to live.



reply to: Man-eaters?
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2009-11-07 22:01:04]
to Christopher Lee,

You and your bovines in Normandy likely are safe, unless you?re worried about a time long past.

Millennia ago, a now-extinct big cat--the sabre-toothed cat called a scimitar?hunted large prey in Europe.

The only scimitar spotted anywhere near your house is indeed long gone: its fossilized leg bone was dredged up last year from the bottom of the North Sea.

As to whether it was a person-eater in its day, current scientific thinking is that big cats are unlikely to attack humans unless they?re stressed by disease or environmental changes. Only then will they seek alternative prey.



Man eaters?
by Christopher Lee

[Comment posted 2009-11-06 14:53:33]
I presume these are man-eaters (perhaps nowadays that should be person-eaters).

Wouldn't like to come across one in the pasture behind our house in Normandy, unless they have a clear preference for bovines. What's current scientific and culturally unbiased thinking on this issue?



More
by anonymous poster

[Comment posted 2009-11-03 11:38:02]
This is a fascinating tale....would like to hear more